Socrates on Trial

Front Cover
Princeton University Press, 1990 M09 4 - 337 pages

Thomas Brickhouse and Nicholas Smith offer a comprehensive historical and philosophical interpretation of, and commentary on, one of Plato's most widely read works, the Apology of Socrates. Virtually every modern interpretation characterizes some part of what Socrates says in the Apology as purposefully irrelevant or even antithetical to convincing the jury to acquit him at his trial. This book, by contrast, argues persuasively that Socrates offers a sincere and well-reasoned defense against the charges he faces. First, the authors establish a consensus of ancient reports about Socrates' moral and religious principles and show that these prohibit him from needlessly risking the condemnation of the jury. Second, they consider each specific claim made by Socrates in the Apology and show how each can be construed as an honest effort to inform the jurors of the truth and to convince them of his blamelessness. The arguments of this book are informed by a critical review of the scholarly literature and careful attention to the philosophy expressed in Plato's other early dialogues.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Preliminaries
1
Socrates Defense Part I 17al24b2
48
Socrates Defense Part II 24b330c 1
109
Socrates Defense Part III 30cl35d8
154
Socrates Final Two Speeches
210
Bibliography
272
List of Periodicals and Abbreviations
311
Index of Passages
325
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information