Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

DISCUSSION

The Rising Cost of Bunker Fuel and Its Impact On The Competitiveness of Merchant Vessels - Figure 1 shows the rise

in the OPEC base price per barrel of crude oil in dollars

[graphic][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small]

percent of the cost of crude, although, at times, depending on supply and demand, spot bunker prices in some ports of the world may be as much as 150 percent to 200 percent of the basic crude price. For example, October 1979 spot bunker prices in Rotterdam were as high as $45 per barrel.

It is this extraordinary rise in bunker prices together with the inherent thermal efficiency of a low-seed diesel engine

[subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors]

that has skewed the present operational cost advantage

so highly in favor of the low-speed diesel engine.

Figure 2 depicts the inherent thermal efficiency of

a low speed diesel engine versus that of a marine

steam turbine system and

Figure 3 shows how this advantage can be visualized

in terms of ship's operating Figure 4 shows how

[graphic]

range.

this efficiency, together

with the increasing predominance of fuel oil costs

when compared to total operating costs has provided

the diesel driven ships

a substantial competitive advantage.

As noted in the introduc

tion to this paper, the

U.S. Merchant Marine is

to date almost totally steam

propelled. Appendix E is

a listing of U.S. flag vessels over 2000 gross tons in operation on 1 April

1979. Four hundred and

[graphic]

eighty one of these vessels

are steam turbine or turbine

electric propulsion, twentyfour are diesel and five

are gas turbine. See Figure 5. In turn, almost all foreign owned flag vessels of less than 20,000 shaft horsepower are propelled by diesel engines and almost all merchant vessels being built

in the world today are diesel powered, see Appendix A and Figure 6. The U.S. merchant

vessel owner owes little

apology for this situation.

Steam propulsion in this country evolved through National needs and through logical technical evolution. See Appendix B. In turn, it was not until the early 1970's that the modern low speed

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

diesel engine had developed to a point where it could

meet these National needs, see Appendix C, and it was at this very time that the last of the relatively large merchant ship building periods in this country's history was coming to an end. Hence, today a wide disparity in U.S. and foreign merchant fleet propulsion exists both with respect to configuration and performance.

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors]

The U.S. Merchant Fleet Consumes Approximately 85 Million
Barrels of oil per Year

[ocr errors]

A strong well-balanced energy

[blocks in formation]

o Accomplishment of a detailed energy audit with
the intended goal to be the re-establishment of
the initial design operating efficiency.

The energy conservation element to be accomplished on a
particular vessel can only be determined after a detailed
economic feasibility analysis has been undertaken which

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small]

criteria that was used to make

a first-cut selection of sev-
enty vessels which could be
considered primary candidates
for diesel retrofit and anoth-
er 130 vessels which would
be candidates for some degree

For the balance of the ves

of steam system modernization. sels an energy audit with associated corrective action would be implemented. Figure 7 depicts the relative fuel savings to be realized by implementation of each of the program elements. The energy conservation element which has a significantly higher potential fuel savings than the other elements, is the replacement of existing steam propulsion systems with a low speed diesel propulsion system.

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »