Losing Iraq: Inside the Postwar Reconstruction FiascoThings didn't go wrong in postwar Iraq because the United States lacked a plan. Things went wrong because the United States was blinded by ideology and ignored planning that was already underway. Losing Iraq tells the story of the tragedy of Iraq, from the first discreet meetings to plan the political transition through the debacle the United States finally created. Losing Iraq is a stunning and revealing look at our recent past--with a candid take on how we can prevent this sort of tragedy from happening again. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Стр. 28
Barham took me to his home, which was surrounded by a cement and stone wall,
and showed me the courtyard where he had narrowly escaped assassination by
Ansar al-Islam, a radical Islamist group made up mainly of Kurds with ties to ...
Barham took me to his home, which was surrounded by a cement and stone wall,
and showed me the courtyard where he had narrowly escaped assassination by
Ansar al-Islam, a radical Islamist group made up mainly of Kurds with ties to ...
Стр. 99
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Стр. 186
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Стр. 250
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Стр. 289
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Отзывы - Написать отзыв
LOSING IRAQ: Inside the Postwar Reconstruction Fiasco
Пользовательский отзыв - KirkusMight does not always equal power, strength does not always yield influence, and "winning the peace requires cooperation from freedom's beneficiaries." So warns policy expert Phillips (Council on ... Читать весь отзыв
Losing Iraq: inside the postwar reconstruction fiasco
Пользовательский отзыв - Not Available - Book VerdictPhillips (senior fellow, Council on Foreign Relations), who, as a former senior advisor to the U.S. State Department, served as an architect of "democracy planning" in Iraq, here provides a ... Читать весь отзыв
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Losing Iraq: Inside the Postwar Reconstruction Fiasco David L. Phillips Недоступно для просмотра - 2006 |
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
Afghanistan Ahmad Chalabi al-Qaeda Allawi American April Arab Shi’a Arab Sunnis army attack Ayatollah Ba’ath Party Ba’athists Baghdad Barzani Brahimi Bremer Bush administration Bush’s Cheney coalition Committee coordinating democracy Democratic Principles Department Deputy elections establish Fallujah Feith Future of Iraq Garner humanitarian Ibid insurgents Iran Iran’s Iranian Iraq Project Iraq’s Iraq’s future Iraqi exiles Iraqi Governing Council Iraqi Kurdistan Iraqi opposition Islamic Jalal Talabani Kanan Khalilzad Kirkuk Kurdish Kurds leaders Marc Grossman meeting Minister Najaf Nasariyah National Security neo-cons Opposition Conference ORHA participate Paul Wolfowitz Pearce Pentagon peshmerga political postwar Powell President Principles Working Group reconstruction regime change role Rumsfeld Ryan Crocker Saddam Hussein Sadr Security Council Senate Foreign Relations Shi’a Sistani Talabani terror terrorist tion transition Turkey Turkey’s Turkish Turkmen U.S. forces U.S. government U.S. military U.S. officials U.S. troops United Nations wanted weapons of mass Wolfowitz Zebari
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 103 - States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
Стр. 16 - We must take the battle to the enemy, disrupt his plans, and confront the worst threats before they emerge. In the world we have entered, the only path to safety is the path of action. And this nation will act.
Стр. 16 - Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.
Стр. 19 - Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us.
Стр. 15 - President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
Стр. 103 - We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side. I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.
Стр. 20 - America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof— the smoking gun — that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.
Стр. 58 - ... challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values; * we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad; <> we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.
Стр. 19 - Saddam Hussein could then be expected to seek domination of the entire Middle East, take control of a great portion of the world's energy supplies, directly threaten America's friends throughout the region, and subject the United States or any other nation to nuclear blackmail.
Стр. 55 - Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/200209 1 2- 1 .html. cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?