Beating Goliath: Why Insurgencies WinPotomac Books, Inc., 2011 - Всего страниц: 193 Beating Goliath examines the phenomenon of victories by the weak over the strong--more specifically, insurgencies that succeeded against great powers. Jeffrey Record reviews eleven insurgent wars from 1775 to the present and determines why the seemingly weaker side won. He concludes that external assistance correlates more consistently with insurgent success than any other explanation. He does not disparage the critical importance of will, strategy, and strong-side regime type or suggest that external assistance guarantees success. Indeed, in all cases, some combination of these factors is usually present. But Record finds few if any cases of unassisted insurgent victories except against the most decrepit regimes. Having identified the ingredients of insurgent success, Record examines the present insurgency in Iraq and whether the United States can win. In so doing, Record employs a comparative analysis of the Vietnam War and the Iraq War. He also identifies and assesses the influence of distinctive features of the American way of war on the U.S. forces' performance against the Iraqi insurgency. Make no mistake: insurgent victories are the exception, not the rule. But when David does beat Goliath, the consequences can be earth shattering and change the course of history. Jeffrey Record's persuasive logic and clear writing make this timely book a must read for scholars, policymakers, military strategists, and anyone interested in the Iraq War's outcome. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 49
Стр. 22
... South Vietnam was securing the enactment of his expensive Great Society program of social reform . Indeed , after he left the White House he bemoaned the resource competition between " that bitch of the war on the other side of the ...
... South Vietnam was securing the enactment of his expensive Great Society program of social reform . Indeed , after he left the White House he bemoaned the resource competition between " that bitch of the war on the other side of the ...
Стр. 23
... Vietnam (1964–68), conceded that the U.S. leadership “underestimated the toughness of the Vietnamese.” 14 Nothing ... South Vietnam effectively controlled by the Communists). No other major belligerent in a twentieth-century war ...
... Vietnam (1964–68), conceded that the U.S. leadership “underestimated the toughness of the Vietnamese.” 14 Nothing ... South Vietnam effectively controlled by the Communists). No other major belligerent in a twentieth-century war ...
Стр. 24
... Vietnam: The Vietnamese Communists were fighting for their country as well as their principles, while the Americans ... South Vietnam. Surely, a Pentagon that had defeated Germany and Japan and that had saved South Korea from the Chinese ...
... Vietnam: The Vietnamese Communists were fighting for their country as well as their principles, while the Americans ... South Vietnam. Surely, a Pentagon that had defeated Germany and Japan and that had saved South Korea from the Chinese ...
Стр. 25
... South Vietnamese regime the Americans were fighting to save . Gen. William C. Westmoreland never comprehended the political consequences of his strategy because he saw the Vietnam War as a military contest , not a political struggle ...
... South Vietnamese regime the Americans were fighting to save . Gen. William C. Westmoreland never comprehended the political consequences of his strategy because he saw the Vietnam War as a military contest , not a political struggle ...
Стр. 31
... Vietnam War in 1965 or 1966, the Johnson administration's prewar claim that America had critical interests in preserving an independent non-Communist South Vietnam would likely have escaped convincing challenge. Military victory tends ...
... Vietnam War in 1965 or 1966, the Johnson administration's prewar claim that America had critical interests in preserving an independent non-Communist South Vietnam would likely have escaped convincing challenge. Military victory tends ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration Afghanistan al Qaeda Algeria American Army War College Arreguin-Toft artillery Asymmetric Conflict attacks Baathist British Bush casualties China Chinese Communist Clausewitz colonies conventional military counterinsurgency decisive defeat Defense democracies democratic effective enemy external assistance failed fight firepower foreign help France French guerrilla warfare Hanoi History Ibid Indochina Insurgency in Iraq invasion Iraq War Iraq's Iraqi insurgency irregular warfare Japanese leadership Lebanon Malayan Emergency Merom militarily military forces military operations military victory Nationalist Naval North numbers outcome PAVN Pentagon percent population protracted Qaeda rebellion regime Saddam Shia side’s Small Wars South Vietnam Soviet Union Soviet-Afghan War Spanish Strategic Studies Institute strategy strength stronger side success Sunni Arab superior tactical targets terrorism terrorist Tet Offensive troops U.S. Army U.S. combat U.S. forces U.S. military United University Press Vietcong Vietminh Vietnam War Vietnamese Vietnamese Communists waging Washington weak weaker side weapons withdrawal York