Beating Goliath: Why Insurgencies WinPotomac Books, Inc., 2011 - Всего страниц: 193 Beating Goliath examines the phenomenon of victories by the weak over the strong--more specifically, insurgencies that succeeded against great powers. Jeffrey Record reviews eleven insurgent wars from 1775 to the present and determines why the seemingly weaker side won. He concludes that external assistance correlates more consistently with insurgent success than any other explanation. He does not disparage the critical importance of will, strategy, and strong-side regime type or suggest that external assistance guarantees success. Indeed, in all cases, some combination of these factors is usually present. But Record finds few if any cases of unassisted insurgent victories except against the most decrepit regimes. Having identified the ingredients of insurgent success, Record examines the present insurgency in Iraq and whether the United States can win. In so doing, Record employs a comparative analysis of the Vietnam War and the Iraq War. He also identifies and assesses the influence of distinctive features of the American way of war on the U.S. forces' performance against the Iraqi insurgency. Make no mistake: insurgent victories are the exception, not the rule. But when David does beat Goliath, the consequences can be earth shattering and change the course of history. Jeffrey Record's persuasive logic and clear writing make this timely book a must read for scholars, policymakers, military strategists, and anyone interested in the Iraq War's outcome. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 71
Стр. 11
... Counterinsurgency is by definition small war because it involves operations by regular government forces against irregular insurgent forces . Small wars are thus qualitatively different from wars in which both sides employ regular ...
... Counterinsurgency is by definition small war because it involves operations by regular government forces against irregular insurgent forces . Small wars are thus qualitatively different from wars in which both sides employ regular ...
Стр. 13
... counterinsurgency, which hands insurgent enemies a major strategic advantage. The following chapter reviews the recent literature about why the strong lose. That literature has postulated strong-actor inferiority of political will, bad ...
... counterinsurgency, which hands insurgent enemies a major strategic advantage. The following chapter reviews the recent literature about why the strong lose. That literature has postulated strong-actor inferiority of political will, bad ...
Стр. 15
... counterinsurgent conflicts. An abiding American embrace of war as a substitute for politics has bred a general ... counterinsurgency is troubling because irregular warfare is increasingly supplanting conventional combat as a means ...
... counterinsurgent conflicts. An abiding American embrace of war as a substitute for politics has bred a general ... counterinsurgency is troubling because irregular warfare is increasingly supplanting conventional combat as a means ...
Стр. 16
... counterinsurgent warfare —to the point where a strong case can be made for adopting a policy of refusing U.S. involvement in foreign internal wars altogether. 1 Explaining Goliath Defeats: Will, Strategy, and Type of Government.
... counterinsurgent warfare —to the point where a strong case can be made for adopting a policy of refusing U.S. involvement in foreign internal wars altogether. 1 Explaining Goliath Defeats: Will, Strategy, and Type of Government.
Стр.
... counterinsurgent power can lose by not winning. Indirect defense via irregular warfare is in most cases the only sensible strategy for the weaker side because a direct defense is an invitation to swift defeat. The principal elements of ...
... counterinsurgent power can lose by not winning. Indirect defense via irregular warfare is in most cases the only sensible strategy for the weaker side because a direct defense is an invitation to swift defeat. The principal elements of ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration Afghanistan al Qaeda Algeria American Army War College Arreguin-Toft artillery Asymmetric Conflict attacks Baathist British Bush casualties China Chinese Communist Clausewitz colonies conventional military counterinsurgency decisive defeat Defense democracies democratic effective enemy external assistance failed fight firepower foreign help France French guerrilla warfare Hanoi History Ibid Indochina Insurgency in Iraq invasion Iraq War Iraq's Iraqi insurgency irregular warfare Japanese leadership Lebanon Malayan Emergency Merom militarily military forces military operations military victory Nationalist Naval North numbers outcome PAVN Pentagon percent population protracted Qaeda rebellion regime Saddam Shia side’s Small Wars South Vietnam Soviet Union Soviet-Afghan War Spanish Strategic Studies Institute strategy strength stronger side success Sunni Arab superior tactical targets terrorism terrorist Tet Offensive troops U.S. Army U.S. combat U.S. forces U.S. military United University Press Vietcong Vietminh Vietnam War Vietnamese Vietnamese Communists waging Washington weak weaker side weapons withdrawal York