...most .1 method to separate eligibility for health insurance :v separation existed (Table 4). -20It was often a simple matter of economics for employers...being too high (33%) or to insufficient profitability (201) — opposite sides of the same proposition. Not surprisingly, these economic reasons were most...

...to separate eligibility for health insurance benefits where such separation existed (Table 4). -19It was often a simple matter of economics for employers...being too high (33%) or to insufficient profitability (201) — opposite sides of the same proposition. Not surprisingly, these economic reasons were most...

...to separate eligibility for health insurance benefits where such separation existed (Table 4). -19It was often a simple matter of economics for employers...attributed their action to premiums being too high (331) or to insufficient profitability (201) — opposite sides of the same proposition. Not surprisingly,...

...1 5 2 2 4 55% 149 27% 15% 29% 1% 6% 8% 15% 12% 4% 117% 842 + includes no answer * less than 0.5% @ respondents could mark more than one answer It was...with coverage for no full-time employees. Another 19% said the firm could not qualify for group coverage, which implies another variant of the cost problem....

...health insurance benefits where such separation existed (Table 4). -20It was often a simple natter of economics for employers who provide no health insurance....with coverage for no full-time employees. Another 19% said the firm could not qualify for group coverage, which implies another variant of the cost problem....

...method to separate eligibility for health insurance benefits where such separation existed (Table 4). It was often a simple matter of economics for employers...attributed their action to premiums being too high (331) or to insufficient profitability (201) — opposite sides of the same proposition. Not surprisingly,...

...less than 0.5% @ respondents could mark more than one answer 27% l5% 29% l% 6% 8% l5% l2% 4% ll7% 842 It was often a simple matter of economics for employers...with coverage for no full-time employees. Another l9% said the firm could not qualify for group coverage, which implies another variant of the cost problem....