and "speak out of the abundance of their" humble "hearts!"

3. He who walks in the light of divine love sees something of God's spiritual, moral, or natural image in all men, the worst not excepted; and, at the sight, that which is merely creaturely in him (by a kind of spiritual instinct found in all who are "born of the Spirit") directly bows to that which is of God in another. He imitates the

captain of a first-rate man-of-war, who, upon seeing the king or queen coming up in a small boat, forgetting the enormous size of his ship, or considering it is the king's own ship, immediately strikes his colours; and the greater vessel, consistently with wisdom and truth, pays respect to the less.

4. The most eminent saint, having known more of the workings of corruption in his own breast, than he can possibly know of the wickedness of any other man's heart, may, with great truth, according to his present views and former feelings of the internal evil he has overcome, call himself" the chief of sinners."

5. Nor does he know but if the feeblest believers had had all his talents and graces, with all his opportunities of doing and receiving good, they would have made far superior advances in the Christian life; and in this view also, without hypocritical humility, he prefers the least saint to himself. Thus, although according to the humble light of others, all true believers certainly undervalue, yet, according to their own humble light, they make a true estimate of themselves.

V. The vindicator, having thus solved a problem of godliness which you have undoubtedly ranked among his "apparent mistakes," he takes the liberty of presenting you with a list of some of your own apparent mistakes on this occasion.

1. In the very letter in which you recant your circular letter, you desire Mr. Wesley to "give up the fatal errors of the Minutes," though you have not yet proved they contain one; you still affirm, "they appear to you evidently subversive of the fundamentals of Christianity," that is, in plain English, still dreadfully heretical; and you produce

a letter which asserts also, without shadow of proof, that "the Minutes were given for the establishment of another foundation than that which is laid;" that they are "repugnant to scripture, the whole plan of man's salvation. under the new covenant of grace, and also to the clear meaning of our established church, as well as to all other protestant churches.”

2. You declare, in your Narrative, that "when you cast your eye over the Minutes you are just where you was;" and assure the public, that “nothing inferior to an attack upon the foundation of our hope, through the all-sufficient sacrifice of Christ, could have been an object sufficient to engage you in its defence:" thus, by continuing to insinuate such an attack was really made, you continue to wound Mr. Wesley in the tenderest part.

3. Although Mr. Wesley and fifty-three of his fellowlabourers have let you quietly "secure the foundation," which, by the bye, had been only shaken in your own ideas, and was perfectly secured by these express words of the Minutes, "Not by the merit of works, but by believing in Christ;" yet, far from allowing them to secure the superstructure in their turn, which would be nothing but just, you begin already a contest with them about "our second justification by works in the day of judgment."

4. Instead of frankly acknowledging the rashness of your step, and the greatness of your mistake with respect to the Minutes, you make a bad matter worse, by treating the Declaration as you have treated them;— forcing upon it a dangerous sense, no less contrary to the scriptures than to Mr. Wesley's meaning and the import of the words.

5. When you speak of the dreadful charges you have brought against the Minutes, you softly call them "misconstructions you may seem to have made of their meaning." Page 22, line 4. Nor is your "acknowledgment" much stronger than your "may seem;" at least it does not appear to many adequate to the hurt done by your circular letter to the practical gospel of Christ and the reputation of his eminent servant, thousands of whose friends you have grieved, offended, or stumbled; while you have con

firmed thousands of his enemies in their hard thoughts of him, and in their unjust contempt of his ministry.

6. And lastly: far from candidly inquiring into the merit of the arguments advanced in the Vindication, you represent them as mere "metaphysical distinctions;" or cast, as a veil, over them a friendly submissive letter of condolence, which was never intended for the use to which you have put it.

Therefore the vindicator, who does not admire a peace founded 66 upon a may seem on your part, and on Mr. Wesley's part upon a Declaration to which you have already fixed a wrong, unscriptural sense of your own, takes this public method to inform you, he thinks his arguments in favour of Mr. Wesley's anti-Crispian propositions, rational, scriptural, and solid; and, once more, he begs you would remove the "veil" you have hitherto cast over all the "apparent mistakes" of his judgment on this occasion, that he may see whether the antinomian gospel of Dr. Crisp is preferable to the practical gospel which Mr. Wesley endeavours to restore to its primitive and scriptural lustre.

VI. Having thus finished my remarks upon the mistakes of your Narrative, I gladly take my leave of controversy for this time would to God it were for ever! I do no more like it than I do applying a caustic to the back of my friends: it is disagreeable to me, and painful to them; and, nevertheless, it must be done when their health and mine is at stake.

I assure you, sir, I do not love the warlike dress of the vindicator, any more than David did the heavy armour of Saul. With gladness, therefore, I cast it aside to throw myself at your feet, and protest to you, that, although I thought it my duty to write to you with the utmost plain. ness, frankness, and honesty, the design of doing it with bitterness never entered my heart. However, for every bitter expression that may have dropped from my sharp, vindicating pen, I ask you pardon; but it must be in general, for neither friends nor foes have yet particularly pointed out to me one such expression.

You have accepted of "a letter of submission" from me; let, I beseech you, a concluding paragraph of submission meet

also with your favourable acceptance. You condescend, reverend sir, to call me your "learned friend." Learning is an accomplishment I never pretended to; but your friendship is an honour I shall always highly esteem, and do at this time value above my own brother's love. Appearances are a little against me: I feel I am a thorn in your flesh; but I am persuaded it is a necessary one, and this persuasion reconciles me to the thankless and disagreeable part I act.

If Ephraim must vex Judah, let Judah bear with Ephraim, till, happily tired of their contention, they feel the truth of Terence's words: “ Amantium (why not credentium) iræ amoris redintegratio est.* I can assure you, my dear sir, without metaphysical distinction, I love and honour you as truly as I dislike the rashness of your well-meant zeal. The motto I thought myself obliged to follow was, E bello pax; but that which I delight in is, In bello

pax:

may we make them harmonize till we learn war and polemic divinity no more!

My Vindication cost me tears of fear, lest I should have wounded you too deep. That fear, I find, was groundless; but should you feel a little for the great truths and the great minister I vindicate, these expostulations will wound me, and probably cost me tears again.

If, in the mean time, we offend our weak brethren, let us do something to lessen the offence till it is removed. Let us show them we make war without so much as shyness. Should you ever come to the next county, as you did last summer, honour me with a line, and I shall gladly wait upon you, and show you, if you permit me, the way to my pulpit, where I shall think myself highly favoured to see you 66 secure the foundation," and hear you enforce the doctrine of justification by faith, which you fear we attack; and, should I ever be within thirty miles of the city where you reside, I shall go to submit myself to you, and beg leave to assist you in reading prayers for

"The misunderstandings of lovers (why not of believers') end in a renewal and increase of love."

t "We make war in order to get peace." "We enjoy peace in the midst of war."

you, or giving the cup with you: thus shall we convince the world that controversy may be conscientiously carried on without interruption of brotherly love; and I shall have the peculiar pleasure of testifying to you in person how sincerely I am,

Honoured and dear sir,

Your submissive and obedient servant,
in the bond of a practical gospel,

J. FLETCHER.

LETTER III.

HONOURED AND REVEREND SIR,

IF I mistake not the workings of my heart, a concern for St. James's " 'pure and undefiled religion" excites me to take the pen once more, and may account for the readiness with which I have met you in the dangerous field of controversy. You may possibly think mere partiality to Mr. Wesley has inspired me with that boldness; and others may be ready to say, as Eliab, We "know the pride and naughtiness of thy heart; thou art come down that thou mightest see the battle:" but may I not answer, with David, "Is there not a cause?"

Is it not highly necessary to make a stand against antinomianism? Is not that gigantic man of sin a more dangerous enemy to king Jesus, than the champion of the Philistines was to king Saul? Has he not defied, more than forty days, the armies and arms, the people and truths, of the living God? By audaciously daring the thousands in Israel, has he not made all the faint-hearted among them ashamed to stand in "the whole armour of God," afraid to defend the important post of duty? And have not many left it already, openly running away, flying. into the dens and caves of earthly-mindedness, "putting their light under a bushel," and even burying themselves alive in the noisome grave of profaneness?

Multitudes, indeed, still keep the field, still make an open profession of godliness; but how few of these