U.S. Policy on Iraq: Hearings Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session, September 19, 23, 25, 2002U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 - Всего страниц: 216 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 50
Стр. 2
... deal with the threat posed by Saddam Hussein . Our actions now in Congress should be devoted to presenting a broad , bipartisan consensus in that critical effort . This does not mean giving a veto to the U.N. over U.S. foreign policy ...
... deal with the threat posed by Saddam Hussein . Our actions now in Congress should be devoted to presenting a broad , bipartisan consensus in that critical effort . This does not mean giving a veto to the U.N. over U.S. foreign policy ...
Стр. 13
... deal about this ruthless man and his brutal regime ; we can- not allow the threat to continue . How will we explain to the American people - in the wake of a future attack on the United States or U.S. interests , directly by Saddam ...
... deal about this ruthless man and his brutal regime ; we can- not allow the threat to continue . How will we explain to the American people - in the wake of a future attack on the United States or U.S. interests , directly by Saddam ...
Стр. 17
... deal with the threat before we are attacked ? There are a number of terrorist states pursuing weapons of mass destruction - Iran , Libya , North Korea , Syria , just to name a few- but no terrorist state poses a greater or more ...
... deal with the threat before we are attacked ? There are a number of terrorist states pursuing weapons of mass destruction - Iran , Libya , North Korea , Syria , just to name a few- but no terrorist state poses a greater or more ...
Стр. 20
... deal of unrest within the country . Take Iran , where their women and the young people are putting pressure on the small clique of clerics who are running that country . In my view , it's possible , at some point , that it could flip ...
... deal of unrest within the country . Take Iran , where their women and the young people are putting pressure on the small clique of clerics who are running that country . In my view , it's possible , at some point , that it could flip ...
Стр. 21
... deal to lose . Wise Iraqis will not obey orders to use weapons of mass destruction . Some have asked , " Well , what's changed to warrant the action now ? " Well , what has changed is our experience on September 11 . What's changed is ...
... deal to lose . Wise Iraqis will not obey orders to use weapons of mass destruction . Some have asked , " Well , what's changed to warrant the action now ? " Well , what has changed is our experience on September 11 . What's changed is ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration Afghanistan aircraft al Qaeda allies American Armed Forces assistant to Senator attack Baghdad believe BERGER BILL NELSON biological weapons capability Chairman LEVIN chemical weapons Clark clear coalition combat command committee Congress Defense disarmament fight going Gulf HOAR inspections inspectors intelligence international community Iran Iraq Iraq's Iraqi regime Israel issue Kuwait mass destruction MCINERNEY military action military force missiles Myers NATO neighbors nuclear weapons Operation Desert Storm posed preemptive President Bush programs Qaeda question regime change region risks Saddam Hussein SCHLESINGER Secretary RUMSFELD Security Council Resolution Senator AKAKA Senator BYRD Senator CLELAND Senator DAYTON Senator KENNEDY Senator REED Senator SESSIONS Senator WARNER September 11 SHALIKASHVILI statement talking terrorism Thank there's things threat tion troops U.N. resolutions U.N. Security Council U.S. military U.S. policy United Nations war on terrorism weapons of mass
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 34 - All the world now faces a test, and the United Nations a difficult and defining moment. Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?
Стр. 25 - States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
Стр. 8 - Member States cooperating with the Government of Kuwait, unless Iraq on or before 15 January 1991 fully implements, as set forth in paragraph 1 above, the foregoing resolutions, to use all necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 (1990) and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area...
Стр. 28 - The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.
Стр. 28 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer.
Стр. 68 - Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States...
Стр. 8 - Iraq shall unconditionally accept the destruction, removal, or rendering harmless, under international supervision, of: (a) All chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and manufacturing facilities...
Стр. 68 - Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq...
Стр. 67 - Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so...
Стр. 34 - Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/200209 1 2- 1 .html. cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?