U.S. Policy on Iraq: Hearings Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session, September 19, 23, 25, 2002U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 - Всего страниц: 216 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 51
Стр. 4
... discussions , a letter requesting that the committee hold these hearings on Iraq . You and I have concurred on a ... discussing the role of our committee in the on - going debates in Congress and in the public on Iraq . Together , we ...
... discussions , a letter requesting that the committee hold these hearings on Iraq . You and I have concurred on a ... discussing the role of our committee in the on - going debates in Congress and in the public on Iraq . Together , we ...
Стр. 6
... discuss the conditions for a ceasefire . Those conditions have never been met . It is now most appropriate that we hear from the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs on the role of the Department of Defense - and ...
... discuss the conditions for a ceasefire . Those conditions have never been met . It is now most appropriate that we hear from the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs on the role of the Department of Defense - and ...
Стр. 12
... discuss the con- ditions for a cease fire . Those conditions have never been met . It is now most appropriate that we hear from the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on the role of the Department of ...
... discuss the con- ditions for a cease fire . Those conditions have never been met . It is now most appropriate that we hear from the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on the role of the Department of ...
Стр. 16
... discuss the task of preventing even more devastating at- tacks , attacks that could kill not thousands , but potentially tens of thousands of our fellow citizens . This is not an intelligence briefing . It is obviously an open hear- ing ...
... discuss the task of preventing even more devastating at- tacks , attacks that could kill not thousands , but potentially tens of thousands of our fellow citizens . This is not an intelligence briefing . It is obviously an open hear- ing ...
Стр. 18
... discuss in detail a number of those issues that have been raised . Let me just touch on a few here this afternoon . Now that Iraq has agreed to unconditional inspections , the ques- tion goes , why does Congress need to act ? Well , if ...
... discuss in detail a number of those issues that have been raised . Let me just touch on a few here this afternoon . Now that Iraq has agreed to unconditional inspections , the ques- tion goes , why does Congress need to act ? Well , if ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration Afghanistan aircraft al Qaeda allies American Armed Forces assistant to Senator attack Baghdad believe BERGER BILL NELSON biological weapons capability Chairman LEVIN chemical weapons Clark clear coalition combat command committee Congress Defense disarmament fight going Gulf HOAR inspections inspectors intelligence international community Iran Iraq Iraq's Iraqi regime Israel issue Kuwait mass destruction MCINERNEY military action military force missiles Myers NATO neighbors nuclear weapons Operation Desert Storm posed preemptive President Bush programs Qaeda question regime change region risks Saddam Hussein SCHLESINGER Secretary RUMSFELD Security Council Resolution Senator AKAKA Senator BYRD Senator CLELAND Senator DAYTON Senator KENNEDY Senator REED Senator SESSIONS Senator WARNER September 11 SHALIKASHVILI statement talking terrorism Thank there's things threat tion troops U.N. resolutions U.N. Security Council U.S. military U.S. policy United Nations war on terrorism weapons of mass
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 34 - All the world now faces a test, and the United Nations a difficult and defining moment. Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?
Стр. 25 - States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
Стр. 8 - Member States cooperating with the Government of Kuwait, unless Iraq on or before 15 January 1991 fully implements, as set forth in paragraph 1 above, the foregoing resolutions, to use all necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 (1990) and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area...
Стр. 28 - The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.
Стр. 28 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer.
Стр. 68 - Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States...
Стр. 8 - Iraq shall unconditionally accept the destruction, removal, or rendering harmless, under international supervision, of: (a) All chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and manufacturing facilities...
Стр. 68 - Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq...
Стр. 67 - Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so...
Стр. 34 - Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/200209 1 2- 1 .html. cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?