U.S. Policy on Iraq: Hearings Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session, September 19, 23, 25, 2002U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 - Всего страниц: 216 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 42
Стр. 3
... fighting force in the world . " There is no doubt in my mind and there should be no doubt in Saddam Hussein's mind- that , once committed , our Armed Forces will prevail in any conflict . None of us seeks such a conflict , but , if it ...
... fighting force in the world . " There is no doubt in my mind and there should be no doubt in Saddam Hussein's mind- that , once committed , our Armed Forces will prevail in any conflict . None of us seeks such a conflict , but , if it ...
Стр. 15
... fight alone would be unwise . We have an opportunity to install a paradigm shift in the Middle East . This is an opportunity to make a real difference to bring the American values of peace , democracy , and free markets , as Tom ...
... fight alone would be unwise . We have an opportunity to install a paradigm shift in the Middle East . This is an opportunity to make a real difference to bring the American values of peace , democracy , and free markets , as Tom ...
Стр. 18
... fight the various elements of the global war on terror simultaneously , as General Myers will indicate in his re- marks . Our principal goal in the war on terror is to stop another Sep- tember 11 , or a weapon of mass destruction attack ...
... fight the various elements of the global war on terror simultaneously , as General Myers will indicate in his re- marks . Our principal goal in the war on terror is to stop another Sep- tember 11 , or a weapon of mass destruction attack ...
Стр. 25
... fight all elements of this war simultaneously . Our principal goal in the war on terror is to stop another September 11 - or a WMD attack that could make September 11 seem modest by comparison - before it happens . Whether that threat ...
... fight all elements of this war simultaneously . Our principal goal in the war on terror is to stop another September 11 - or a WMD attack that could make September 11 seem modest by comparison - before it happens . Whether that threat ...
Стр. 37
... fight . As we have done in Op- eration Desert Storm , in Bosnia , in Kosovo and most recently in Afghanistan , our Armed Forces are always ready to integrate the military capabilities of our allies and partners into a decidedly superior ...
... fight . As we have done in Op- eration Desert Storm , in Bosnia , in Kosovo and most recently in Afghanistan , our Armed Forces are always ready to integrate the military capabilities of our allies and partners into a decidedly superior ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration Afghanistan aircraft al Qaeda allies American Armed Forces assistant to Senator attack Baghdad believe BERGER BILL NELSON biological weapons capability Chairman LEVIN chemical weapons Clark clear coalition combat command committee Congress Defense disarmament fight going Gulf HOAR inspections inspectors intelligence international community Iran Iraq Iraq's Iraqi regime Israel issue Kuwait mass destruction MCINERNEY military action military force missiles Myers NATO neighbors nuclear weapons Operation Desert Storm posed preemptive President Bush programs Qaeda question regime change region risks Saddam Hussein SCHLESINGER Secretary RUMSFELD Security Council Resolution Senator AKAKA Senator BYRD Senator CLELAND Senator DAYTON Senator KENNEDY Senator REED Senator SESSIONS Senator WARNER September 11 SHALIKASHVILI statement talking terrorism Thank there's things threat tion troops U.N. resolutions U.N. Security Council U.S. military U.S. policy United Nations war on terrorism weapons of mass
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 34 - All the world now faces a test, and the United Nations a difficult and defining moment. Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?
Стр. 25 - States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
Стр. 8 - Member States cooperating with the Government of Kuwait, unless Iraq on or before 15 January 1991 fully implements, as set forth in paragraph 1 above, the foregoing resolutions, to use all necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 (1990) and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area...
Стр. 28 - The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.
Стр. 28 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer.
Стр. 68 - Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States...
Стр. 8 - Iraq shall unconditionally accept the destruction, removal, or rendering harmless, under international supervision, of: (a) All chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and manufacturing facilities...
Стр. 68 - Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq...
Стр. 67 - Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so...
Стр. 34 - Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/200209 1 2- 1 .html. cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?