The Geneva Protocol of 1925: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, First Session, on Executive J, 91st Congress, 2d Session ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 - Всего страниц: 439 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 100
Стр. iii
... interpretation that the Geneva Protocol does not prohibit the use of tear gas and herbicides in warfare . These views were set forth in a letter which I sent to the President on behalf of the Committee on April 15 , 1971. ( A copy of ...
... interpretation that the Geneva Protocol does not prohibit the use of tear gas and herbicides in warfare . These views were set forth in a letter which I sent to the President on behalf of the Committee on April 15 , 1971. ( A copy of ...
Стр. iv
... interpretation of the Protocol . In my view it is regrettable that the Executive Branch has ignored the Committee's efforts to resolve the difficulties posed by its interpreta- tion of the Protocol . It is now more important than ever ...
... interpretation of the Protocol . In my view it is regrettable that the Executive Branch has ignored the Committee's efforts to resolve the difficulties posed by its interpreta- tion of the Protocol . It is now more important than ever ...
Стр. 2
... interpretation of the scope of the protocol . Although there is wide agreement among the existing parties to the protocol on this point - and considerable difference between them and the present interpretation of the adminis- tration ...
... interpretation of the scope of the protocol . Although there is wide agreement among the existing parties to the protocol on this point - and considerable difference between them and the present interpretation of the adminis- tration ...
Стр. 5
... interpretation and , in addition , made clear we disagreed with this interpretation . The resolution was adopted by a vote of 80 to three , with 36 absten- tions . Participating in the General Assembly vote were 80 of the 84 states at ...
... interpretation and , in addition , made clear we disagreed with this interpretation . The resolution was adopted by a vote of 80 to three , with 36 absten- tions . Participating in the General Assembly vote were 80 of the 84 states at ...
Стр. 6
... interpretation . Second , if we did enter a formal interpretation , other states parties might feel obligated to take exception to our statement in order to preserve their own understanding of the protocol . We believe it is well ...
... interpretation . Second , if we did enter a formal interpretation , other states parties might feel obligated to take exception to our statement in order to preserve their own understanding of the protocol . We believe it is well ...
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration agreement American arms control Army asphyxiating Assembly bacteriological believe biological agents biological warfare biological weapons Cambodian CHAIRMAN chemical agents chemical and biological chemical herbicides chemical warfare chemical weapons civilian committee CONGRESS THE LIBRARY convention countries crop destruction damage Defense defoliation Department Disarmament draft effects enemy forces forest GALSTON gas and herbicides Geneva Protocol Government harassing agents herbicides herbicides in Vietnam international law interpretation lethal chemical mangrove MESELSON methods of warfare military Nixon non-lethal NUTTER parties plantations plants poison gas position possible President prohibition Protocol of 1925 question ratification ratified the protocol reservation resolution riot control agents riot gas rubber Saigon Secretary ROGERS Senator AIKEN Senator CHURCH Senator SPARKMAN South Vietnam Soviet sprayed statement supra note tear gas tear gases tion toxic treaty trees understanding United Nations Viet Cong Vietnamese vote Warsaw Pact
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 339 - Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices...
Стр. 48 - All States shall co-operate with the competent international organizations in taking measures for the prevention of pollution of the seas or air space above, resulting from any activities with radioactive materials or other harmful agents.
Стр. 134 - Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
Стр. 95 - Powers agree to abstain from the use of projectiles the sole object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases.
Стр. 48 - These freedoms, and others which are recognized by the general principles of international law, shall be exercised by all States with reasonable regard to the interests of other States in their exercise of the freedom of the high seas.
Стр. 429 - Recognizing the important significance of the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on June 17, 1925...
Стр. 138 - Paragraphs 1 to 3 do not apply to provisions relating to the protection of the human person contained in treaties of a humanitarian character, in particular to provisions prohibiting any form of reprisals against persons protected by such treaties.
Стр. 173 - Request for an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons...
Стр. 155 - The provisions contained in the Regulations referred to in Article 1, as well as in the present Convention, do not apply except between Contracting Powers, and then only if all the belligerents are parties to the Convention.
Стр. 385 - Any chemical agents of warfare - chemical substances, whether gaseous, liquid or solid - which might be employed because of their direct toxic effects on man, animals or plants; (b) Any biological agents of warfare - living organisms, whatever their nature, or infective material derived from them - which are intended to cause disease or death in man, animals or plants...