The Geneva Protocol of 1925: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, First Session, on Executive J, 91st Congress, 2d Session ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 - Всего страниц: 439 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 80
Стр. 2
... parties to the protocol on this point - and considerable difference between them and the present interpretation of the adminis- tration -- it is the Senate's responsibility to give its advice on the basis of the interest of the United ...
... parties to the protocol on this point - and considerable difference between them and the present interpretation of the adminis- tration -- it is the Senate's responsibility to give its advice on the basis of the interest of the United ...
Стр. 4
... parties to the protocol . Since January 1970 , 12 countries , including Japan and Brazil , have become parties . All our NATO allies are parties . The Soviet Union and all but one of its Warsaw Pact allies are parties , as is Communist ...
... parties to the protocol . Since January 1970 , 12 countries , including Japan and Brazil , have become parties . All our NATO allies are parties . The Soviet Union and all but one of its Warsaw Pact allies are parties , as is Communist ...
Стр. 5
... parties to the protocol . Twenty - nine of them were among the 36 who abstained on the resolution and two of them , Aus tralia and Portugal , joined the United States in voting against it . This split vote among the parties to the ...
... parties to the protocol . Twenty - nine of them were among the 36 who abstained on the resolution and two of them , Aus tralia and Portugal , joined the United States in voting against it . This split vote among the parties to the ...
Стр. 6
... parties might feel obligated to take exception to our statement in order to preserve their own understanding of the protocol . We believe it is well understood that a difference of opinion exists among the parties on this point . We do ...
... parties might feel obligated to take exception to our statement in order to preserve their own understanding of the protocol . We believe it is well understood that a difference of opinion exists among the parties on this point . We do ...
Стр. 7
... parties might consider relevant at the time . EFFECT OF U.S. FAILURE TO RATIFY The failure of the United States to ratify the protocol has obscured the leading role this country has played since World War I in urging the international ...
... parties might consider relevant at the time . EFFECT OF U.S. FAILURE TO RATIFY The failure of the United States to ratify the protocol has obscured the leading role this country has played since World War I in urging the international ...
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration agreement American arms control Army asphyxiating Assembly bacteriological believe biological agents biological warfare biological weapons Cambodian CHAIRMAN chemical agents chemical and biological chemical herbicides chemical warfare chemical weapons civilian committee CONGRESS THE LIBRARY convention countries crop destruction damage Defense defoliation Department Disarmament draft effects enemy forces forest GALSTON gas and herbicides Geneva Protocol Government harassing agents herbicides herbicides in Vietnam international law interpretation lethal chemical mangrove MESELSON methods of warfare military Nixon non-lethal NUTTER parties plantations plants poison gas position possible President prohibition Protocol of 1925 question ratification ratified the protocol reservation resolution riot control agents riot gas rubber Saigon Secretary ROGERS Senator AIKEN Senator CHURCH Senator SPARKMAN South Vietnam Soviet sprayed statement supra note tear gas tear gases tion toxic treaty trees understanding United Nations Viet Cong Vietnamese vote Warsaw Pact
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 339 - Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices...
Стр. 48 - All States shall co-operate with the competent international organizations in taking measures for the prevention of pollution of the seas or air space above, resulting from any activities with radioactive materials or other harmful agents.
Стр. 134 - Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
Стр. 95 - Powers agree to abstain from the use of projectiles the sole object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases.
Стр. 48 - These freedoms, and others which are recognized by the general principles of international law, shall be exercised by all States with reasonable regard to the interests of other States in their exercise of the freedom of the high seas.
Стр. 429 - Recognizing the important significance of the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on June 17, 1925...
Стр. 138 - Paragraphs 1 to 3 do not apply to provisions relating to the protection of the human person contained in treaties of a humanitarian character, in particular to provisions prohibiting any form of reprisals against persons protected by such treaties.
Стр. 173 - Request for an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons...
Стр. 155 - The provisions contained in the Regulations referred to in Article 1, as well as in the present Convention, do not apply except between Contracting Powers, and then only if all the belligerents are parties to the Convention.
Стр. 385 - Any chemical agents of warfare - chemical substances, whether gaseous, liquid or solid - which might be employed because of their direct toxic effects on man, animals or plants; (b) Any biological agents of warfare - living organisms, whatever their nature, or infective material derived from them - which are intended to cause disease or death in man, animals or plants...