THE QUARTERLY REVIEW. No. 455. PUBLISHED IN APRIL, 1918. LONDON: JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET NEW YORK: LEONARD SCOTT PUBLICATION COMPANY 1918. GENERAL INDEX TO THE QUARTERLY REVIEW. A new Index, forming Volume CCXXII., comprising the volumes from CCII. to CCXXI., of the QUARTERLY REVIEW, has been published, and is obtainable through any bookseller (Price 6/- net). The QUARTERLY REVIEW is published on or about the 15th of Price Twenty-four Shillings per Annum, post free. Printed by WILLIAM CLOWES AND SONS, Limited, London and Beccles, England. THE QUARTERLY REVIEW. No. 455.-APRIL, 1918. Art. 1.-ETON; THE OLD AND THE NEW. 1. History of Eton College, 1440-1910. By Sir H. Maxwell Lyte. 4th Edition. Macmillan, 1911. 2. Annals of the King's College of our Lady of Eton beside Windsor. By Wasey Sterry. Methuen, 1898. 3. A History of Eton College. By Lionel Cust. Duckworth, 1899. 4. Fasti Etonenses. By A. C. Benson. Eton: Ingalton Drake, 1899. 5. Eton in the Forties. By A. D. Coleridge. Bentley, 1898. 6. Memories of Eton Sixty Years Ago. By A. C. Ainger. Murray, 1917. 7. Eton in the 'Seventies. By the Hon. Gilbert Coleridge. Smith, Elder, 1902 8. Eton in the Eighties. By Eric Parker. Smith, Elder, 1909. 9. Etoniana. Nos I-XXI. By R. C. Austen Leigh. Spottiswoode, 1917. And other works. OF making many books there is no end, but neither the making nor the reading appears to be weariness when they deal with Eton. Lord Harcourt has lately presented the school with his collection of Etoniana; it ends at the date 1900 and contains more than 2000 volumes, of which, without counting the issues of school periodicals, no fewer than 565 come within the reign of Queen Victoria. Nor does the output slacken. Mr Ainger opportunely fills a gap by his Eton Sixty Years Ago'; and there is no year since 1830 and few since 1810 not the subject of Vol. 229.-No. 455. X one or other, if not several, of these writers. Naturally one finds a certain sameness in their tone and much repetition of their anecdotes. Sir H. Maxwell Lyte's History, now in its fourth edition, laid the excellent foundation; Mr Wasey Sterry and Mr Lionel Cust added some independent research; Mr R. C. Austen Leigh ('Etoniana,' Nos I-XXI) still collects antiquarian details of minute accuracy. Others are more bent on rehearsing with relish their early escapades, and were evidently as desperate fellows as ever was Mr Robert Shallow before he became Justice of the Peace and Ratolorum too.' The remainder content themselves with thoughtfully reflecting their impressions of the scenes among which they passed their boyhood. It is true that among all these there is no tale so outstanding as 'Tom Brown,' so brightly popular as 'David Blaize,' so soft as 'Eric,' so soaring as 'The Hill,' so saucy as 'Stalky & Co.,' so perverse as 'The Loom of Youth.' The Eton books have for the most part a balance and a reticence characteristic of the place. The sleeve displays a deal of embroidery but not the heart. One has to go deeper for that. There is, then, a difference to be found between the Eton type and others. In what does it consist? A guest at a country house once said: 'If there are two Eton men in the smoking-room I take my candle and go upstairs.' The remark cuts both ways. To go on 'yarning' of your schooldays may argue want of manners and consideration for others or some narrowness of outlook; but it also suggests the overmastering attraction of the theme. At the Front it is said to be noted that Old Etonians meet with an eagerness quite unlike that of others, and it would not be unfair to claim that the affection for Eton has few parallels. In the last century the liberal bounty of Old Harrovians was far greater and their cricket attendance not less devoted, but then the needs of Harrow were supposed to be more urgent. Perhaps a better test may be found in desertions. There is evidence that many boys are sent to Eton whose parents were prominent at other schools, but very few Etonians send their sons elsewhere except for pecuniary reasons. If this be so, it becomes a matter of some importance to examine the sources of such affection and to ask whether it is earned rightly and fairly or by over-indulgence. How does Eton compare with other schools in results; and what are the Public Schools doing for our Fatherland in War and in Peace? We know they are the admiration and despair of other countries and often abused in this. Are they to be remodelled or preserved ? The answer, as regards war time, need not be difficult. There has been no more remarkable, no more convincing outcome of this war than the splendid efficiency of those two classes, the Public School officer and the ordinary private soldier. It is not only that each is so surprisingly good at his job, but that they work so well together, that as a whole the officers love their men and the men their officers. At a time when at home the relations of labour and capital are dangerously strained, the representatives of the same two classes are sharing privations and risking death together at the Front with a mutual loyalty and keen affection which has gone far towards the saving of England. War, however, is not a normal state. There can be no doubt about the absolute need for the Public School officer in the army. What about peace? To decide whether the output of the Public School fails in peace would be a harder task. The limits of an article forbid a searching examination, yet lists of the heads of departments, religious and civil, furnish, no less than the army Commands, a prima facie verdict in its favour. The Navy we omit, of course, though not unrepresented in high command; it specialises at too early an age. Nor will we enumerate eminent ecclesiastics, statesmen, rulers of dependencies, permanent secretaries, legal authorities and the like, and then strike out those who have had no public school training, because, however convincing the result may appear, it will be really superficial, inasmuch as the Public School is the most obvious English method of education. The mention of the viceroys of India suggests a test for our question. For that high office a remarkable succession of Etonians may be claimed. Yet since it is one that requires rank and fortune, and these do largely gravitate towards Eton, this test is also inconclusive. Therefore, without further labouring the point, we may at least be justified in claiming that Eton has well discharged its function in providing that 'there may |