on the shelf and available for application. (The technologies are not intended to compare technology level in currently deployed military systems.) 2. The technologies selected have the potential for significantly changing military capability in the next... United States Military Posture for FY ... - Стр. 10авторы: United States. Organization of the Joint Chiefs of StaffПолный просмотр - Подробнее о книге
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Defense - 1984 - Страниц: 846
...valid base for comparing overall US and USSR baste technology Theltst ism alphabetical order Th«s« technologies are "on the shelf and available for application....technology level in currently deployed military systems) 2. The technologies selected have the potential for significantly changing the military capability... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services - 1984 - Страниц: 1568
...comparing overall US and USSR basic technology The list is m alphabetical order These te<hnologies are "on the shelf and available for application (The...technology level in currently deployed military systems ) 2 The technologies selected have the potential for significantly changing the military capability... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services - 1984 - Страниц: 1376
...objective of providing a valid base for comparing overall US and USSR basic technology The list is m alphabetical order These technologies are "on the...technologies are not intended to compare technology level m currently deployed military systems ) 2 The technologies selected have the potential for significantly... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services - 1986 - Страниц: 656
...were selected with the objective of providing a valid base lor companng overa* U 5. and USSR bestc technology The list is in alphabetical order. These...currently DEPLOYED military systems ) — The technologies selectee1 have the potential for significantly CHANGING the military capability in the next to to 20... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services - 1986 - Страниц: 888
...ts limited to 20 technologies, which were selected with me obfectrve O» providing a valid base for comparing overall US and USSR basic technology The...These technologies are "on the shelf' and available lor application (The technologies are not intended 10 compare technology '«vel <n currently DEPLOYED... | |
| Charles Herzfeld - 1988 - Страниц: 150
...to 20 technologies that in aggregate, were selected with the objective of providing a valid base for comparing overall US and USSR basic technology. The...technology level in currently deployed military systems. 2. The technologies selected have the potential for significantly changing the military capability... | |
| |