 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations - 1937 - Страниц: 982
...it may be necessary for 10 years or 20 years to take care •of this because if you shut down a mine a year from now or 5 years from now or 10 years from now it is j\ist as devastating in its results as if you shut it down now. Mr. SEGERSTROM. I agree with... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. House. Committee on insular affairs - 1940 - Страниц: 484
...present time is a continental and has always been a continental. But no one knows next year, or 2 years from now, or 5 years from now, or 10 years from now that it might not be a native Puerto Rican. Until 2 or 3 months ago we had a Puerto Rican attorney... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1952 - Страниц: 1512
...difference outside of the inconvenience of having to store and keep them, whether the war came 3 years from now or 5 years from now or 10 years from now ; but that is not true of an item like this radio. General REEDER. I would like to supply the answer... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1952 - Страниц: 1486
...difference outside of the inconvenience of having to store and keep them, whether the war came 3 years from now or 5 years from now or 10 years from now; but that is not true of an item like this radio. General REEDER. I would like to supply the answer... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1955 - Страниц: 1816
...Mr. Merrill said it would not cost more than that based upon the present design. Mr. SCHIVNER. But present plans can be changed a great deal a year from...about this over several years — $125 million is just the first bite. General WASHBorRXE. We feel the contract will be ready in great numbers this coming... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Appropriations Committee - 1957 - Страниц: 984
...that it may be necessary for 10 years or 20 years to take care of this because if you shut down a mine a year from now or 5 years from now or 10 years from now it is just as devastating in its results as if you shut it down now. Mr. SEGERSTROM. I agree with you... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations - 1959 - Страниц: 2326
...that it may be necessary for 10 years or 20 years to take care of this because if you shut down a mine a year from now or 5 years from now or 10 years from now it is just as devastating in its results as if j'ou shut it down now. Mr. SEGERSTROM. I agree with... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance - 1961 - Страниц: 58
...does it not? Secretary DILLON. Yes. Senator CURTIS. Even though the benefits that we have voted, for a year from now, or 5 years from now or 10 years from now, may te tremendous. Here again, I am not asking you for comment. I just want to express for the record... | |
| |
... DWORSHAK. Do you think this is a pretty big order, I mean over the years? It may not be for 1 year, but on the base of what you say and I know you are an authority on tungsten, I make the inference that it may be necessary for 10 years or 20 years... 
