Senator ANDREWS. Let me point out your own answer or the answer of your ship. The question was: Assuming a 1 week deployment scenario, what percentage of flights or cargo would be considered outsize? Your answer: Approximately [deleted] percent. Now if [deleted] percent is this outsize stuff that can only fit into a C-5 and the rest of it is stuff that can fit into a 747, why can't you have a mixed fleet?

Mr. CARLUCCI. Because that [deleted] percent refers to weight and the problem is cube.

Senator ANDREWS. What do you mean, outsize is outsize. If we asked the question outsize, you would give us a nonanswer?

Mr. CARLUCCI. I didn't write that answer, but a lot of the outsize-

Senator ANDREWS. Well, the people in your ship wrote it and classified it on May 12.

Mr. CARLUCCI. Let me elaborate on it because a lot of the outsize is relatively light equipment. Our aircraft cube out before they weigh out.

What we have done is run models on this. We have demonstrated through the models that in any of the four scenarios there is over a 50-percent shortfall in our ability to meet delivery requirements for outsize equipment. I would be glad to submit charts.

[The information follows:]

CMMS

Outsize Cargo Shortfalls

(Measured 20 days after decision to deploy, using existing C-5 fleet dedicated to moving outsize cargo with no regard to unit integrity)

0

0 1 2 3

4 5 6 7.

8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

DAYS OF DEPLOYMENT TO THEATER (C-DAY PLUS)