...rights, has passed into history. In Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 US 663, 669, we stated: "Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause do change." That statement is in harmony with my view of the Fourteenth Amendment, as expressed by my Brother BRENNAN:...

...at a given time deemed to be the limits of fundamental rights. See M alloy v. Hogan, 378 US 1, 5-6. Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes...Amendment commands. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537. Seven of the eight Justices then sitting subscribed to the Court's opinion, thus joining in expressions...

...the 14th amendment is set forth in this sentence, which appears on page 660 of the majority opinion : "Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the equal protection clause do change. Xow, the necessary implication of that is that every time the notions of the majority of the Justices...

...Third. As the majority opinion in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Electifjnj,, 383 US 663, states : "Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause do change." When the "notions" of Supreme Court Justices change, the meanings of constitutional provisions change...

...Third. As the majority opinion in Harper \. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 US 663, states : "Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause do change." When the "notions" of Supreme Court Justices change, the meanings of constitutional provisions change...

...a fixed catalogue of what was at a given time deemed to be the limits of fundamental rights. * * * Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause do change." Certainly, the dicta in cases decided more than a half century ago do not render future challenges...

...unconstitutionally discriminatory we have never been confined to historic notions of equality .... Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause do change."109 That the Court was correct in its assessment of our emergent principle of absolute equality...

...a fixed catalogue of what was at a given time deemed to be the limits of fundamental rights. * * * Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause do change." Certainly, the dicta in cases decided more than a half century ago do not render future challenges...

...unconstitutionally discriminatory, we have never been confined to historic notions of equality . . . Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the Equal Protection clause do change." Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, supra at 669. Thus, when faced with state classifications that...

...catalogue of what was at a given time deemed to be the limits of fundamental rights (citations omitted). Notions of what constitutes equal treatment for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause do change." 383 US at (569-70 (Emphasis in original.). Cases such as BradiccH, supra, upholding sex-based discrimination...