Beating Goliath: Why Insurgencies WinPotomac Books, 2007 - Всего страниц: 180 Beating Goliath examines the phenomenon of victories by the weak over the strong--more specifically, insurgencies that succeeded against great powers. Jeffrey Record reviews eleven insurgent wars from 1775 to the present and determines why the seemingly weaker side won. He concludes that external assistance correlates more consistently with insurgent success than any other explanation. He does not disparage the critical importance of will, strategy, and strong-side regime type or suggest that external assistance guarantees success. Indeed, in all cases, some combination of these factors is usually present. But Record finds few if any cases of unassisted insurgent victories except against the most decrepit regimes. Having identified the ingredients of insurgent success, Record examines the present insurgency in Iraq and whether the United States can win. In so doing, Record employs a comparative analysis of the Vietnam War and the Iraq War. He also identifies and assesses the influence of distinctive features of the American way of war on the U.S. forces' performance against the Iraqi insurgency. Make no mistake: insurgent victories are the exception, not the rule. But when David does beat Goliath, the consequences can be earth shattering and change the course of history. Jeffrey Record's persuasive logic and clear writing make this timely book a must read for scholars, policymakers, military strategists, and anyone interested in the Iraq War's outcome. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 17
Стр. 11
... Direct attack's " main goal is to win the war by destroying the adversary's capacity to resist with armed forces . Both attrition and blitzkrieg are direct - attack strategies . " 31 The second strategy available to the strong actor is ...
... Direct attack's " main goal is to win the war by destroying the adversary's capacity to resist with armed forces . Both attrition and blitzkrieg are direct - attack strategies . " 31 The second strategy available to the strong actor is ...
Стр. 43
... direct U.S. military inter- vention might have made a difference , but that was never in the cards . The United States was recklessly demobilizing ; Europe lay undefended ; and the Truman ad- ministration believed there were no U.S. ...
... direct U.S. military inter- vention might have made a difference , but that was never in the cards . The United States was recklessly demobilizing ; Europe lay undefended ; and the Truman ad- ministration believed there were no U.S. ...
Стр. 65
... direct against direct , or indirect against indirect ― strong actors should win . " On the other hand , if “ strong and weak ac- tors employ strategies representing opposite strategic approaches - direct against indirect or indirect ...
... direct against direct , or indirect against indirect ― strong actors should win . " On the other hand , if “ strong and weak ac- tors employ strategies representing opposite strategic approaches - direct against indirect or indirect ...
Содержание
The Role of External Assistance | 23 |
Search and Destroy | 117 |
Conclusion | 131 |
Авторские права | |
Не показаны другие разделы: 3
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration American Arab armed army attacks attempted battle believed British Bush casualties China Chinese civil colonies combat command committed Communist continued conventional conventional military costs counterinsurgency critical decisive defeat Defense democracies democratic determined direct effective enemy especially external assistance fact factors failed fight foreign France French ground guerrilla important Institute interests internal intervention involved Iraq Iraqi insurgency irregular John leadership less limited lose losses lost major material means militarily Nationalist never North numbers objectives observes operations organization outcome peace percent political population President protracted regime regular resistance side Small Wars South Vietnam Soviet Spanish strategy strength strong stronger Studies success Sunni superior supply tactical terrorism terrorist threat tion trained troops U.S. forces U.S. military Union United University Press victory Vietnamese Communists waging warfare Washington weak weaker weapons withdrawal World York