The George W. Bush Presidency: An Early AssessmentFred I. Greenstein Johns Hopkins University Press, 4 нояб. 2003 г. - Всего страниц: 314 Between his inauguration and September 11, 2001, George W. Bush's presidency appeared to lack focus. The rhetoric of the campaign trail did not readily translate into concrete policies and a closely divided Congress restrained executive action. The terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, however, changed all of that. In their aftermath, Bush emerged as a strong, decisive leader with a deep sense of purpose and certainty that inspired many Americans, even as it alienated much of the rest of the world. In The George W. Bush Presidency: An Early Assessment, noted presidential scholar Fred I. Greenstein brings together a distinguished group of political scientists to consider the first two-and-a-half years of the George W. Bush presidency, from his leadership style and political ethos to his budgetary and foreign policies to his relationship with Congress, the electorate, and the American public. This balanced and timely volume concludes with an invaluable insider's view of the president and his administration by John J. DiIulio, the first Director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. Contributors: Richard A. Brody, Ivo Daalder, John J. Dilulio, Jr., John Fortier, Hugh Heclo, Karen M. Hult, Gary Jacobson, Charles O. Jones, James Lindsay, Norman Ornstein, and Allen Schick |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 3 из 25
... deficit than a bigger government with a smaller deficit . Another lesson is that the political system and the budget process are biased in favor of more taxes and more spending . In the eyes of many conservatives , the expansionary bias ...
... deficit in the system , Congress raised rates a bit more than was necessary to cover the deficit , the new funds permitted a further expansion in benefits leading to deficit , and the process repeated itself . Bush wants to break this ...
... deficit does not have much influence on economic development . The deficit does not do much good in the short run , and it does not damage the economy in the long run . What matters is not the size of the deficit , but the structure of ...