Chemical-biological Warfare: U.S. Policies and International Effects: Hearings, Ninety-first Congress, First SessionU.S. Government Printing Office, 1970 - Всего страниц: 513 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 100
Стр.
... American Friends Service Committee_ . Page 261 263 APPENDIX B The Geneva Protocol of 1925 . French text of the ... American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Salk Institute APPENDIX F Table I , some chemical agents .. Table II , some ...
... American Friends Service Committee_ . Page 261 263 APPENDIX B The Geneva Protocol of 1925 . French text of the ... American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Salk Institute APPENDIX F Table I , some chemical agents .. Table II , some ...
Стр.
... America's traditional “ no- first - use " policy on lethal chemical and biological agents . Exactly 1 week after the subcommittee had opened hearings on the resolutions , the President in an historic statement on November 25 announced ...
... America's traditional “ no- first - use " policy on lethal chemical and biological agents . Exactly 1 week after the subcommittee had opened hearings on the resolutions , the President in an historic statement on November 25 announced ...
Стр. 2
... substan- tially during this decade . Because the Pentagon has surrounded chemical and biological weap- ons with greater secrecy than it has imposed on nuclear weapons , Con- gress and the American public have been unaware of this 2.
... substan- tially during this decade . Because the Pentagon has surrounded chemical and biological weap- ons with greater secrecy than it has imposed on nuclear weapons , Con- gress and the American public have been unaware of this 2.
Стр. 3
... American public have been unaware of this policy change . The Pentagon has spent a minimum of $ 2 billion on those weapons since 1961 with virtually no congressional review until this year . It is hardly surprising that we have produced ...
... American public have been unaware of this policy change . The Pentagon has spent a minimum of $ 2 billion on those weapons since 1961 with virtually no congressional review until this year . It is hardly surprising that we have produced ...
Стр. 13
... American policy concerning CBW has been one of possible swift retaliation , not one of initiation . President Roosevelt made a landmark statement to that effect on June 8 , 1943 , in the midst of World War II . President Eisenhower ...
... American policy concerning CBW has been one of possible swift retaliation , not one of initiation . President Roosevelt made a landmark statement to that effect on June 8 , 1943 , in the midst of World War II . President Eisenhower ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
Admiral LEMOS aerosol animals arms control asphyxiating attack bacteriological biological biological agents biological capability biological warfare biological weapons BUNN casualties cause Chairman chemical agents chemical and bacteriological chemical and biological chemical capability chemical warfare chemical weapons civilians committee Conference CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Convention countries crops damage decision defoliants DELLENBACK deterrence Disarmament disease effects enemy forces FRASER FULTON Geneva Protocol Government herbicides incapacitating chemicals infection international law issue kill Lederberg lethal chemical LIBRARY OF CONGRESS MCCARTHY ment MESELSON methods of warfare military nuclear weapons parties PICKERING plants poison gas population possible President President's problem produce prohibited protective Protocol of 1925 question ratify the protocol Republic resolution retaliation riot control agents Secretary Senate South Vietnam Soviet spray statement stockpiling subcommittee supra note SWYTER tear gas tear gases tion toxic toxins treaty U.S. Representative United Nations Vietcong Vietnamese ZABLOCKI
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 325 - Powers agree to abstain from the use of projectiles the sole object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases.
Стр. 304 - The signatory powers, to the end that this prohibition shall be universally accepted as a part of international law binding alike the conscience and...
Стр. 277 - Each Party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other Parties to the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance.
Стр. 459 - Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating , Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925, and condemns all actions contrary to those objectives ; 2.
Стр. 283 - Treaty before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this article may accede to it at any time. 2. This Treaty shall be subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification and instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Governments of the...
Стр. 175 - BACTERIOLOGICAL METHODS OF WARFARE Signed at Geneva June 17, 1925 Entered into force February 8, 1928 The Undersigned Plenipotentiaries, in the name of their respective Governments: Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices...
Стр. 282 - Governments of the People's Republic of Bulgaria, the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, the Hungarian People's Republic, the Mongolian People's Republic, the Polish People's Republic, the Socialist Republic of Romania...
Стр. 276 - Determined, for the sake of all mankind, to exclude completely the possibility of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins being used as weapons, Convinced that such use would be repugnant to the conscience of mankind and that no effort should be spared to minimize this risk...
Стр. 1 - Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare The undersigned Plenipotentiaries, in the name of their respective Governments: Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices...
Стр. 281 - ... the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons and...