Chemical-biological Warfare: U.S. Policies and International Effects: Hearings, Ninety-first Congress, First SessionU.S. Government Printing Office, 1970 - Всего страниц: 513 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 100
Стр.
... United Kingdom draft proposal --- Canadian draft proposal .-- " Third World " draft proposal .. Warsaw Bloc draft proposal .. 269 270 271 275 276 278 280 281 APPENDIX C CBW and national security , study group paper of Members of ...
... United Kingdom draft proposal --- Canadian draft proposal .-- " Third World " draft proposal .. Warsaw Bloc draft proposal .. 269 270 271 275 276 278 280 281 APPENDIX C CBW and national security , study group paper of Members of ...
Стр. 6
... United Arab Republic - December 6 , 1928 1,6 United Kingdom - April 9 , 1930 1.6 Venezuela - February 8 , 1928 Yugoslavia - April 12 , 19291 Lithuania - June 15 , 1933 Luxembourg - September 1 , 1936 1 With reservation . Zambia 2 By ...
... United Arab Republic - December 6 , 1928 1,6 United Kingdom - April 9 , 1930 1.6 Venezuela - February 8 , 1928 Yugoslavia - April 12 , 19291 Lithuania - June 15 , 1933 Luxembourg - September 1 , 1936 1 With reservation . Zambia 2 By ...
Стр. 7
... United Nations report , the 14 - member report that tear gas came within the prohibition of the 1925 protocol . ALLEGED DEVIATIONS FROM NO - FIRST - USE POLICY Mr. ZABLOCKI . I would like to develop that point and obtain your views ...
... United Nations report , the 14 - member report that tear gas came within the prohibition of the 1925 protocol . ALLEGED DEVIATIONS FROM NO - FIRST - USE POLICY Mr. ZABLOCKI . I would like to develop that point and obtain your views ...
Стр. 14
... United States is already , in effect , committed to a CBW policy of no - first - use . Several arguments for ratification seem persuasive to me . First , it was the United States which originally proposed the pro- tocol in 1925. Our ...
... United States is already , in effect , committed to a CBW policy of no - first - use . Several arguments for ratification seem persuasive to me . First , it was the United States which originally proposed the pro- tocol in 1925. Our ...
Стр. 15
... United States . Tear gas is only effec- tive against troops lacking simple gas masks . In addition , it could probably only be used in operations where the United States is not an ally of a protocol adherent which feels that the use of ...
... United States . Tear gas is only effec- tive against troops lacking simple gas masks . In addition , it could probably only be used in operations where the United States is not an ally of a protocol adherent which feels that the use of ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
Admiral LEMOS aerosol animals arms control asphyxiating attack bacteriological biological biological agents biological capability biological warfare biological weapons BUNN casualties cause Chairman chemical agents chemical and bacteriological chemical and biological chemical capability chemical warfare chemical weapons civilians committee Conference CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Convention countries crops damage decision defoliants DELLENBACK deterrence Disarmament disease effects enemy forces FRASER FULTON Geneva Protocol Government herbicides incapacitating chemicals infection international law issue kill Lederberg lethal chemical LIBRARY OF CONGRESS MCCARTHY ment MESELSON methods of warfare military nuclear weapons parties PICKERING plants poison gas population possible President President's problem produce prohibited protective Protocol of 1925 question ratify the protocol Republic resolution retaliation riot control agents Secretary Senate South Vietnam Soviet spray statement stockpiling subcommittee supra note SWYTER tear gas tear gases tion toxic toxins treaty U.S. Representative United Nations Vietcong Vietnamese ZABLOCKI
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 325 - Powers agree to abstain from the use of projectiles the sole object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases.
Стр. 304 - The signatory powers, to the end that this prohibition shall be universally accepted as a part of international law binding alike the conscience and...
Стр. 277 - Each Party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other Parties to the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance.
Стр. 459 - Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating , Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925, and condemns all actions contrary to those objectives ; 2.
Стр. 283 - Treaty before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this article may accede to it at any time. 2. This Treaty shall be subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification and instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Governments of the...
Стр. 175 - BACTERIOLOGICAL METHODS OF WARFARE Signed at Geneva June 17, 1925 Entered into force February 8, 1928 The Undersigned Plenipotentiaries, in the name of their respective Governments: Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices...
Стр. 282 - Governments of the People's Republic of Bulgaria, the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, the Hungarian People's Republic, the Mongolian People's Republic, the Polish People's Republic, the Socialist Republic of Romania...
Стр. 276 - Determined, for the sake of all mankind, to exclude completely the possibility of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins being used as weapons, Convinced that such use would be repugnant to the conscience of mankind and that no effort should be spared to minimize this risk...
Стр. 1 - Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare The undersigned Plenipotentiaries, in the name of their respective Governments: Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices...
Стр. 281 - ... the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons and...