The Opposite Mirrors: An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions

Front Cover
Springer Science & Business Media, 1995 M02 28 - 229 pages
How do social institutions exist? How do they direct our conduct? The Opposite Mirrors defends the thesis that the existence of institutions is a conventional matter. Ultimately they exist because we believe in their existence, and because they play a role in our practical reasoning. Human action necessarily has an unpredictable aspect; human institutions perform an important task by reducing uncertainty in our interactions. The author applies this thesis to the most important institutions: the law and the monetary system. In his analysis he connects many traditional topics of the philosophy of law, social philosophy and the philosophy of social sciences in a new way. He discusses the nature of rules, authority, and power and analyzes the Hobbesian presuppositions which have been dominant in legal theory and in the economic analyses of the state.
The book is written for legal theorists as well as for political and social philosophers, and theoretically oriented social scientists.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

GAME THEORY AND MUTUAL BELIEFS
30
MONEY
51
AUTHORITY AND COORDINATION
80
THE FOUNDATIONS OF LEGAL SYSTEMS
105
CONVENTIONALISM AND LAW
134
EFFICACY AND OBLIGATION
167
THE ROLE OF FORCE
185
CONCLUSIONS
208
INDEX OF NAMES
227
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information