 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1975 - Страниц: 1030
...for the merger, holding that the merger would be anticompetitive in character and not "required by serious transportation need necessary to secure important...benefits or in furtherance of a valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act." He also held that the supplemental agreement regarding disposition of US Lines... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1975 - Страниц: 1066
...for the merger, holding that the merger would be anticompetitive in character and not "required by serious transportation need necessary to secure important...benefits or in furtherance of a valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act." He also held that the supplemental agreement regarding disposition of US Lines... | |
 | United States. Federal Maritime Commission - 1970 - Страниц: 442
...the present contract of Respondents. It is up to Respondents to show that the .two-contract system is required by a serious transportation need, necessary to secure important public benefits or in the furtherance of some valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act.11 With this in mind we will review... | |
 | United States. Federal Maritime Commission - 1976 - Страниц: 88
...antitrust laws. As such, these agreements are contrary to the public interest unless they are ". . .required by a serious transportation need, necessary...benefits or in furtherance of a valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act," that is, justified. FMC, et al. v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien, et al.,... | |
 | United States. Federal Maritime Commission - 1980 - Страниц: 1048
...requires justification under the Svenska test. The record does not justify a holding that Agreement 8330-2 is required by a serious transportation need, necessary...benefits, or in furtherance of a valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act. Indeed, Article 13 of Agreement 8330-2 is so broad, indefinite and vague, as is... | |
 | United States. Federal Maritime Commission - 1981 - Страниц: 1168
...public interest turns on if they are "required by a serious transportation need, necessary in order to secure important public benefits or in furtherance of a valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act." United States Lines v. Federal Maritime Commission, 584 F.2d 519 (DC Cir. 1978).... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1968 - Страниц: 1132
...approved only if the conferences can "bring forth such facts as would demonstrate that the . . . rule was required by a serious transportation need, necessary...benefits or in furtherance of a valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act." See — FMC, at — . In the present cases, but for the partial immunity granted... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1968 - Страниц: 1180
...approved only if the conferences can "bring forth such facts as would demonstrate that the . . . rule was required by a serious transportation need, necessary...benefits or in furtherance of a valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act." See FMC, at . In the present cases, but for the partial immunity granted by the... | |
 | United States. Federal Maritime Commission - 1972 - Страниц: 352
...subject dual rate contract is in the public interest — required by legitimate commercial objective that is, required by a serious transportation need, necessary to secure important public benefits and is in furtherance of valid regulatory purpose. In the aforesaid regard I more specifically conclude... | |
| |
... bring forth such facts as would demonstrate that the rule was required by a serious transportation need, necessary to secure important public benefits or in furtherance of a valid regulatory purpose of the Shipping Act. 
