...and cannot participate in tribal government. The Court cited Worcester v. Georgia for the proposition "that Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing...sovereignty over both their members and their territory," and held that tribes are a "separate people" with power to regulate their internal and social relations,...

...good deal more than 'private voluntary organizations' " : Thus it Is an important aspect of this case that Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing...attributes of sovereignty over both their members and their territories, Worcester v. Georgia, 6 Pet. 515, 557 (1832) ; they are "a separate people" possessing...

...seem to be in that direction, however. Rather, it seems to favor reaffirmation of Indian tribes as "unique aggregations possessing attributes of sovereignty over both their members and their territory."32 Ironically, it is delay by Indian tribes in asserting these powers that ultimately may...

...cases recognize that the Indian tribes have not given up their full sovereignty. We have recently said that Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing...their members and their territory ... (They) are a good deal more than 'private, voluntary organizations.'" ... The sovereignty that the Indian tribes...

...purpose of the record, the United States Supreme Court has defined what is an Indian "tribe" as being "unique aggregations possessing attributes of sovereignty over both their members and their territory," Worcester v. Georgia, 6 Peters 515 at 577 ; "a separate people possessing the power of regulating their...

....Haiurie, 419 OS 544, 557 (1975), quoted with approval. Vnited States v. wheeler, 435 US 313, : (1978) , "Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing...sovereignty over both their members and their territory . . . .* -4governnent of its members) , the United States Supreme Court has recognized other inherent...

...tribes have a direct relationship established by Treaty or Executive Order with the federal government. "Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing...sovereignty over both their members and their territory." (See US v. Maguire 410 US 544, 55.7 (1975)). Because the Clean Air Act did not delegate authority to...

...tribes have a direct relationship established by Treaty or Executive Order with the federal government. "Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing attributes of sovereignty over both their •embers and their territory." (See US y. Maguire 410 US 544, 55.7 (1975)). Because the Clean Air...

...respective spheres of State and tribal authority over Indian reservations, we have continued to stress that 'Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing...attributes of sovereignty over both their members and their territory1.... Because of their sovereign status, tribes and their reservation lands are insulated...

...respective spheres of State and tribal authority over Indian reservations, we have continued to stress that 'Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing...sovereignty over both their members and their territory' Because of their sovereign status, tribes and their reservation lands are Insulated in some respects...