United States Policy Toward Iraq: Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session : Hearing Held September 10, 18, 19, 26, and October 2, 2002U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 - Всего страниц: 412 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 99
Стр. 12
... chemical , and nuclear program . That wasn't his forte ; it wasn't what he was doing . Why he is doing what he is doing now , as Dr. Kay mentioned , compared to what he was saying four years ago and what he is say- ing now , he is ...
... chemical , and nuclear program . That wasn't his forte ; it wasn't what he was doing . Why he is doing what he is doing now , as Dr. Kay mentioned , compared to what he was saying four years ago and what he is say- ing now , he is ...
Стр. 13
... chemical bio- logical or nuclear materials ? Dr. KAY . I was not looking for it . I was looking for the origins of the Iraqi program , where they got their technology . I know of no evidence during the period of the inspections on the ...
... chemical bio- logical or nuclear materials ? Dr. KAY . I was not looking for it . I was looking for the origins of the Iraqi program , where they got their technology . I know of no evidence during the period of the inspections on the ...
Стр. 16
... chemical weapons program and went to what is called " dusty VX , " a form of VX designed to penetrate high - protec- tive gear , and probably " novachuk " , agents which , in fact , you can produce with nonprescribed substances . That ...
... chemical weapons program and went to what is called " dusty VX , " a form of VX designed to penetrate high - protec- tive gear , and probably " novachuk " , agents which , in fact , you can produce with nonprescribed substances . That ...
Стр. 18
... chemical and biological weap- ons , that he used them against his own and used them against Iran in the war . But my question goes back to something that— really what Mr. Allen was talking about , this whole issue of " Why now ? Why so ...
... chemical and biological weap- ons , that he used them against his own and used them against Iran in the war . But my question goes back to something that— really what Mr. Allen was talking about , this whole issue of " Why now ? Why so ...
Стр. 19
... chemical and bio- logical against his neighbors and know that we won't go . But you put your finger on the heart of the issue , and that is what sort of person he is and what does he care about his survival . We have a hard time - let ...
... chemical and bio- logical against his neighbors and know that we won't go . But you put your finger on the heart of the issue , and that is what sort of person he is and what does he care about his survival . We have a hard time - let ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration Afghanistan al Qaeda allies American approved Armed Services attack believe biological weapons bomb capability centrifuge Chairman chemical weapons civilian CLARK coalition COHEN Commerce Department committee computers deal Defense DUNCAN HUNTER ECCN efforts equipment export controls fact forces Gary Milhollin going Gulf HAMZA hearing http://www.wisconsinproject.org/pubs/reports/1991/licensemd.html HUNTER inspec inspection regime inspectors intelligence Iran Iraq Iraq's weapons Iraqi regime issue Kuwait Licensing Mass Destruction look maraging steel mass destruction program Milhollin military action missile MYERS neighbors Nuclear Referral List nuclear weapons O'HANLON operations Perle President problem Qaeda question regime change resolutions risk Sa'ad Saddam Hussein Saudi Arabia SCUD Secretary RUMSFELD September 11th Skelton SPERTZEL statement talking terrorism testimony things threat tion troops tubes United Nations UNSCOM uranium war on terrorism weapons of mass weapons program WMD programs
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 152 - States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
Стр. 151 - We will work with the UN Security Council for the necessary resolutions. But the purposes of the United States should not be doubted. The Security Council resolutions will be enforced — the just demands of peace and security will be met — or action will be unavoidable. And a regime that has lost its legitimacy will also lose its power.
Стр. 158 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer.
Стр. 345 - ... next year and the year after that, and the year after that, will be impaired.
Стр. 167 - Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/200209 1 2- 1 .html. cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?
Стр. 166 - Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal.
Стр. 168 - Kampf indicating what he intended to do. But the hope was that maybe he would not do what he said. Between 35 and 60 million people died because of a series of fatal miscalculations. He might have been stopped early — at a minimal cost of lives— had the vast majority of the world's leaders not decided at the time that the risks of acting were greater than the risks of not acting. Today, we must decide whether the risks of acting are greater than the risks of not acting. Saddam Hussein has made...
Стр. 77 - There are a number of terrorist states pursuing weapons of mass destruction — Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, to name but a few. But no terrorist state poses a greater and more immediate threat to the security of our people, and the stability of the world, than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
Стр. 154 - Some have argued that the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent— that Saddam is at least 5-7 years away from having nuclear weapons. I would not be so certain.
Стр. 152 - But Saddam Hussein has defied all these efforts and continues to develop weapons of mass destruction. The first time we may be completely certain he has nuclear weapons is when, God forbids, he uses one. We owe it to all our citizens to do everything in our power to prevent that day from coming.