United States Policy Toward Iraq: Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session : Hearing Held September 10, 18, 19, 26, and October 2, 2002U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 - Всего страниц: 412 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 63
Стр. 2
... decision against Iraq must begin with answers to basic ques- tions , and you can help us with answering those questions here today . And we thank you very much for your attendance . [ The prepared statement of Mr. Skelton can be found ...
... decision against Iraq must begin with answers to basic ques- tions , and you can help us with answering those questions here today . And we thank you very much for your attendance . [ The prepared statement of Mr. Skelton can be found ...
Стр. 14
... deciding what the appropriate strategy is . And in your testimony , Dr. Kay , you said near the end , what is clear is that unless we take immediate steps to address the issue of removing Saddam's regime from power in Iraq , we will ...
... deciding what the appropriate strategy is . And in your testimony , Dr. Kay , you said near the end , what is clear is that unless we take immediate steps to address the issue of removing Saddam's regime from power in Iraq , we will ...
Стр. 19
... decision . I would prefer not to run the risk of greater weapons in the hands of an individual like Saddam that attracts his neighbors either to cut deals with him or to de- velop their own weapons of mass destruction and try to deal ...
... decision . I would prefer not to run the risk of greater weapons in the hands of an individual like Saddam that attracts his neighbors either to cut deals with him or to de- velop their own weapons of mass destruction and try to deal ...
Стр. 20
... decision is we either do something to change that regime's mind — and if that means changing the regime , so be it - or we decide we don't really care what he does and we are willing to live with it , because don't expect containment ...
... decision is we either do something to change that regime's mind — and if that means changing the regime , so be it - or we decide we don't really care what he does and we are willing to live with it , because don't expect containment ...
Стр. 25
... deciding whether our sons and daughters should risk their lives , you know , despite the fact that say that they do have , you know , what they - you know , in terms of working on nuclear and all the other stuff , despite that , you ...
... deciding whether our sons and daughters should risk their lives , you know , despite the fact that say that they do have , you know , what they - you know , in terms of working on nuclear and all the other stuff , despite that , you ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
administration Afghanistan al Qaeda allies American approved Armed Services attack believe biological weapons bomb capability centrifuge Chairman chemical weapons civilian CLARK coalition COHEN Commerce Department committee computers deal Defense DUNCAN HUNTER ECCN efforts equipment export controls fact forces Gary Milhollin going Gulf HAMZA hearing http://www.wisconsinproject.org/pubs/reports/1991/licensemd.html HUNTER inspec inspection regime inspectors intelligence Iran Iraq Iraq's weapons Iraqi regime issue Kuwait Licensing Mass Destruction look maraging steel mass destruction program Milhollin military action missile MYERS neighbors Nuclear Referral List nuclear weapons O'HANLON operations Perle President problem Qaeda question regime change resolutions risk Sa'ad Saddam Hussein Saudi Arabia SCUD Secretary RUMSFELD September 11th Skelton SPERTZEL statement talking terrorism testimony things threat tion troops tubes United Nations UNSCOM uranium war on terrorism weapons of mass weapons program WMD programs
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 152 - States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
Стр. 151 - We will work with the UN Security Council for the necessary resolutions. But the purposes of the United States should not be doubted. The Security Council resolutions will be enforced — the just demands of peace and security will be met — or action will be unavoidable. And a regime that has lost its legitimacy will also lose its power.
Стр. 158 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer.
Стр. 345 - ... next year and the year after that, and the year after that, will be impaired.
Стр. 167 - Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/200209 1 2- 1 .html. cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?
Стр. 166 - Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal.
Стр. 168 - Kampf indicating what he intended to do. But the hope was that maybe he would not do what he said. Between 35 and 60 million people died because of a series of fatal miscalculations. He might have been stopped early — at a minimal cost of lives— had the vast majority of the world's leaders not decided at the time that the risks of acting were greater than the risks of not acting. Today, we must decide whether the risks of acting are greater than the risks of not acting. Saddam Hussein has made...
Стр. 77 - There are a number of terrorist states pursuing weapons of mass destruction — Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, to name but a few. But no terrorist state poses a greater and more immediate threat to the security of our people, and the stability of the world, than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
Стр. 154 - Some have argued that the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent— that Saddam is at least 5-7 years away from having nuclear weapons. I would not be so certain.
Стр. 152 - But Saddam Hussein has defied all these efforts and continues to develop weapons of mass destruction. The first time we may be completely certain he has nuclear weapons is when, God forbids, he uses one. We owe it to all our citizens to do everything in our power to prevent that day from coming.