United States Policy Toward Iraq: Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session : Hearing Held September 10, 18, 19, 26, and October 2, 2002U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 - Всего страниц: 412 |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 77
Стр. 3
I think that would probably be the way that would get us through this afternoon by
the most effective means possible . Let me just start with a couple of very broad ,
general comments , because I think they are central to what you are going to be ...
I think that would probably be the way that would get us through this afternoon by
the most effective means possible . Let me just start with a couple of very broad ,
general comments , because I think they are central to what you are going to be ...
Стр. 5
... later , the special security organization , including up through 1990-91 , and
probably presently today . In 1991 , Iraq's biological weapons ( BW ) program
was in an accelerating expansion phase ; and it was not obliterated , as stated by
Iraq ...
... later , the special security organization , including up through 1990-91 , and
probably presently today . In 1991 , Iraq's biological weapons ( BW ) program
was in an accelerating expansion phase ; and it was not obliterated , as stated by
Iraq ...
Стр. 6
... one of the last BW inspections in Iraq , they presented as evidence to us , for a
point they were making , a document that had allegedly existed since 1992 , but
in point of fact , it didn't take much analysis to indicate that it was probably written
...
... one of the last BW inspections in Iraq , they presented as evidence to us , for a
point they were making , a document that had allegedly existed since 1992 , but
in point of fact , it didn't take much analysis to indicate that it was probably written
...
Стр. 7
... talking about those that have been detected , and what you don't know is what
you haven't detected and that is what should probably worry you more that on
their bases it would take Iraq three to six years to produce enough nuclear
material ...
... talking about those that have been detected , and what you don't know is what
you haven't detected and that is what should probably worry you more that on
their bases it would take Iraq three to six years to produce enough nuclear
material ...
Стр. 8
But on the other hand , in a port area like the Port of Long Beach , Los Angeles ,
the Port of Newark or the New York Port Authority , Norfolk , any number of places
, interface on a ship between water and ground , it would be in probably tens of ...
But on the other hand , in a port area like the Port of Long Beach , Los Angeles ,
the Port of Newark or the New York Port Authority , Norfolk , any number of places
, interface on a ship between water and ground , it would be in probably tens of ...
Отзывы - Написать отзыв
Не удалось найти ни одного отзыва.
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
able action administration agree allies American answer approved Armed attack believe biological building Chairman chemical clear Commerce committee computers concern Congress continue deal Defense Department don't effective efforts equipment evidence export fact forces give going Gulf happen hearing hope HUNTER important inspections inspectors intelligence Iraq Iraq's Iraqi issue kind Kurds Licensing look mass destruction material mean military missile nuclear nuclear weapons operations possible President probably problem production question reason regime region resolutions risk Saddam Hussein Secretary RUMSFELD September Services statement sure talking tell terrorism terrorist Thank things threat tion understand United Nations valued weapons of mass weeks
Популярные отрывки
Стр. 150 - States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
Стр. 149 - We will work with the UN Security Council for the necessary resolutions. But the purposes of the United States should not be doubted. The Security Council resolutions will be enforced — the just demands of peace and security will be met — or action will be unavoidable. And a regime that has lost its legitimacy will also lose its power.
Стр. 156 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer.
Стр. 343 - ... next year and the year after that, and the year after that, will be impaired.
Стр. 165 - Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/200209 1 2- 1 .html. cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?
Стр. 164 - Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal.
Стр. 166 - Kampf indicating what he intended to do. But the hope was that maybe he would not do what he said. Between 35 and 60 million people died because of a series of fatal miscalculations. He might have been stopped early — at a minimal cost of lives— had the vast majority of the world's leaders not decided at the time that the risks of acting were greater than the risks of not acting. Today, we must decide whether the risks of acting are greater than the risks of not acting. Saddam Hussein has made...
Стр. 75 - There are a number of terrorist states pursuing weapons of mass destruction — Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, to name but a few. But no terrorist state poses a greater and more immediate threat to the security of our people, and the stability of the world, than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
Стр. 152 - Some have argued that the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent— that Saddam is at least 5-7 years away from having nuclear weapons. I would not be so certain.
Стр. 150 - But Saddam Hussein has defied all these efforts and continues to develop weapons of mass destruction. The first time we may be completely certain he has nuclear weapons is when, God forbids, he uses one. We owe it to all our citizens to do everything in our power to prevent that day from coming.