Deterrence - the promise of massive retaliation against nations - means nothing against shadowy terrorist networks with no nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver... The Iraq War Reader: History, Documents, Opinions - Стр. 269авторы: Christopher Cerf - 2003 - Страниц: 736Ограниченный просмотр - Подробнее о книге
| Michael Waldman - Страниц: 363
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles...solemnly sign non-proliferation treaties, and then systemically break them. If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long.... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations - 2003 - Страниц: 94
...President Bush put the problem succinctly in his important June 2002 Commencement Speech at West Point. "We cannot put our faith in the word of tyrants, who...non-proliferation treaties, and then systematically break them." Thus, the US concentrates all its effort on proliferation cheaters. Focusing on cheaters, and even... | |
| Michael Hirsh - 2003 - Страниц: 312
...relentless attempts to obtain weapons of mass destruction were proof of the uselessness of arms control. "We cannot put our faith in the word of tyrants who solemnly sign nonproliferation treaties and then systemically break them," Bush said in his West Point speech. "The era of arms control is dead " said... | |
| Robert J. Art - 2003 - Страниц: 352
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies." Both at <www.whitehouse.gov>. 9. For critiques of primacy, see Robert Jervis, "International Primacy:... | |
| Jeffrey T. Bergner - 2003 - Страниц: 236
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies." Indeed, the identity of all those responsible even for September 1 1 remains unknown. Among them were... | |
| Seyom Brown - 2004 - Страниц: 228
...most destructive weapons." Full text in The New York Times, January 20, 2002. tors with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies.. . . Homeland defense and missile defense are a part of stronger security, and they're essential priorities... | |
| Nancy Snow - 2003 - Страниц: 180
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies... the war on terror will not be won on the defensive. We must take the battle to the enemy, disrupt his... | |
| |