Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to VietnamHarper Collins, 8 мая 1998 г. - Всего страниц: 480 "The war in Vietnam was not lost in the field, nor was it lost on the front pages of the New York Times or the college campuses. It was lost in Washington, D.C." - H. R. McMaster (from the Conclusion) Dereliction Of Duty is a stunning new analysis of how and why the United States became involved in an all-out and disastrous war in Southeast Asia. Fully and convincingly researched, based on recently released transcripts and personal accounts of crucial meetings, confrontations and decisions, it is the only book that fully re-creates what happened and why. It also pinpoints the policies and decisions that got the United States into the morass and reveals who made these decisions and the motives behind them, disproving the published theories of other historians and excuses of the participants. Dereliction Of Duty covers the story in strong narrative fashion, focusing on a fascinating cast of characters: President Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, General Maxwell Taylor, McGeorge Bundy and other top aides who deliberately deceived the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the U.S. Congress and the American public. Sure to generate controversy, Dereliction Of Duty is an explosive and authoritative new look at the controversy concerning the United States involvement in Vietnam. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 13
... believed that Kennedy's ire was misdirected . The president consulted the JCS only after he had made the decision to launch the invasion . The military ser- vices had provided personnel on special assignment to the CIA 6 DERELICTION OF ...
... believed had been unfair criticism after the Bay of Pigs , the Chiefs were determined that any commitment of U.S. military force not suffer from the indecision and lack of firepower that had been evident in the abortive Cuban invasion ...
... believed that strategic options in military affairs should give him more flexibility than a stark choice between inaction and large - scale commitment . Meanwhile prepa- rations for the deployment of the Marines , coupled with ...
... believed that the United States , engaged in protracted competition with the Soviet Union , had to husband American economic strength as the basis for prevailing in the Cold War.33 When the fighting in Korea ended on July 26 , 1953 ...
... believed that Congress and the public should be aware of the dissenting views of the nation's top military leaders.43 However , Taylor revised his opinions on the proper relationship between the military and the commander in chief when ...
Содержание
1 | |
24 | |
42 | |
Graduated Pressure JanuaryMarch 1964 | 62 |
From Distrust to Deceit MarchJuly 1964 | 85 |
Across the Threshold JulyAugust 1964 | 107 |
Contriving Consensus AugustSeptember 1964 | 137 |
Prophecies Rejected and the Path of Least Resistance SeptemberNovember 1964 | 155 |
The Foot in the Door FebruaryMarch 1965 | 217 |
A Quicksand of Lies MarchApril 1965 | 243 |
The Coach and His Team AprilJune 1965 | 262 |
War without Direction AprilJune 1965 | 275 |
Five Silent Men July 1965 | 300 |
Epilogue | 323 |
Notes | 335 |
Selected Bibliography | 419 |
Planning for Failure NovemberDecember 1964 | 179 |
A Fork in the Road December 1964February 1965 | 197 |
Index | 435 |
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff H. R. McMaster Ограниченный просмотр - 2011 |
Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the ... H. R. McMaster Недоступно для просмотра - 1998 |
Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff H. R. McMaster Недоступно для просмотра - 2011 |