Allies At WarMcGraw Hill Professional, 7 апр. 2004 г. - Всего страниц: 272 A thorough analysis of where U.S./European relations have gone wrong--and how to set them right ALLIES AT WAR is the first and most comprehensive assessment of what went wrong between America and Europe during the crisis over Iraq and is based on extensive interviews with policymakers in the United States and Europe. It puts the crisis over Iraq in historical context by examining US-Europe relations since World War II and shows how the alliance traditionally managed to overcome its many internal difficulties and crises. It describes how the deep strategic differences that emerged at the end of the Cold War and the disputes over the Balkans and the Middle East during the Clinton years already had some analysts questioning whether the Alliance could survive. It shows how the Bush administration’s unilateral diplomacy and world-view helped bring already simmering tensions to a boil, and describes in depth the events leading up to the Iraq crisis of 2003. Gordon and Shapiro explain how powerful forces such rising American power and the September 11 terrorist attacks have made relations between America and Europe increasingly difficult. But the authors argue that the split over Iraq was not inevitable: it was the result of misguided decisions and unnecessary provocations on both sides. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that claims that the Iraq war signaled the effective end of the Atlantic Alliance, the authors warn that assuming the end of the Alliance could quickly become a self-fulfilling prophesy: leaving the United States isolated, resented, and responsible for bearing the burdens of maintaining international security largely alone. In response to those who argue that the Atlantic Alliance is no longer viable or necessary, ALLIES AT WAR demonstrates that even after Iraq, the United States and Europe can work together, and indeed must if they wish to effectively address the most pressing problems of our age. The book makes concrete proposals for restoring transatlantic relations and updating the alliance to meet new challenges like global terrorism and the transformation of an unstable Middle East. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 5
... deal with the United States. By the time the war actually began in March 2003, the Iraq crisis was no longer just a result of transatlantic differences, but a significant cause of them. The crisis reinforced many of the worst. 2 ALLIES ...
... deal with the Iraq problem was to change the regime by force. Their new sense of vulnerability led them to accept the argument that regime change in Iraq was necessary, and the unprecedented power of the United States, together with the ...
... deal with Iraq to a debate about international order and America's management of it. Misguided decisions and unnecessary provocations in France and Germany also contributed to the Iraq clash. Facing difficult legislative elections in ...
... , Truman and Eisenhower handled NATO as much as they did the Congress of the United States: by cutting deals instead of imposing wills.” Despite the recognized need for compromise, however, the Atlantic alliance. 23 FROM COLD WAR TO ...
... deal with disputes that could allow for their resolution in a manner short of outright coercion. Intra-alliance disputes in the 1960s, particularly between the United States and France, perversely help demonstrate the fundamental ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis Over Iraq Philip H. Gordon,Jeremy Shapiro Просмотр фрагмента - 2004 |