Allies At WarMcGraw Hill Professional, 7 апр. 2004 г. - Всего страниц: 272 A thorough analysis of where U.S./European relations have gone wrong--and how to set them right ALLIES AT WAR is the first and most comprehensive assessment of what went wrong between America and Europe during the crisis over Iraq and is based on extensive interviews with policymakers in the United States and Europe. It puts the crisis over Iraq in historical context by examining US-Europe relations since World War II and shows how the alliance traditionally managed to overcome its many internal difficulties and crises. It describes how the deep strategic differences that emerged at the end of the Cold War and the disputes over the Balkans and the Middle East during the Clinton years already had some analysts questioning whether the Alliance could survive. It shows how the Bush administration’s unilateral diplomacy and world-view helped bring already simmering tensions to a boil, and describes in depth the events leading up to the Iraq crisis of 2003. Gordon and Shapiro explain how powerful forces such rising American power and the September 11 terrorist attacks have made relations between America and Europe increasingly difficult. But the authors argue that the split over Iraq was not inevitable: it was the result of misguided decisions and unnecessary provocations on both sides. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that claims that the Iraq war signaled the effective end of the Atlantic Alliance, the authors warn that assuming the end of the Alliance could quickly become a self-fulfilling prophesy: leaving the United States isolated, resented, and responsible for bearing the burdens of maintaining international security largely alone. In response to those who argue that the Atlantic Alliance is no longer viable or necessary, ALLIES AT WAR demonstrates that even after Iraq, the United States and Europe can work together, and indeed must if they wish to effectively address the most pressing problems of our age. The book makes concrete proposals for restoring transatlantic relations and updating the alliance to meet new challenges like global terrorism and the transformation of an unstable Middle East. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 5
... opinion of the United States as late as summer 2002, by March 2003 such opinions were sharply down across the board—from 75 to 48 percent in Britain, 70 to 34 percent in Italy, 63 to 31 percent in France, 61 to 25 percent in Germany, 61 ...
... opinion became increasingly antiwar, and, perhaps most important, Germany, Russia, Turkey, and several members of the Security Council maintained their opposition. Under those circumstances, Chirac decided in January 2003 to stand up to ...
... opinion throughout Europe. France's ambitious Gaullist president thus not only chose to oppose the war, but he launched a high-profile campaign to try to stop it. The style with which Chirac went about opposing the United States ...
... opinion might still oppose U.S. policy. But if the U.S. government asserted that a given action was critical for American and Western security, European leaders effectively agreed to manage their public opinion or, at worst, to stand ...
... opinion ran strongly against the French and people began boycotting French products and pouring French wine into the streets, again just as in 2003. But Johnson kept his cool, declaring, “When a man asks you to leave . . . you take your ...
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis Over Iraq Philip H. Gordon,Jeremy Shapiro Просмотр фрагмента - 2004 |