...in Barry v. Croskey (ubi supra), in which case his Honour said that to bring it within the principle the injury must be the immediate and not the remote consequence of the representation. The case of Ogilvie v. Currie\(ubi supra'), is a case precisely in point now, and Lord Calms in his...

...which a third person acts, and, so acting, is injured or damnified—provided it appear, that such false representation was made with the intent that it should be acted upon by such third person in the manner that occasions the injury or loss. In Langridge v. Levy (a), the false representation...

...the manner that occasions the injury or loss. Third:—But, to bring it within the second principle, the injury must be the immediate, and not the remote, consequence of the representation thus made. A bill averred, that Defendants, the directors and secretary of a projected railway company,...

...person acts ; and so acting intent to misis injured or damnified, provided it appear that such e art a false representation was made with the intent that it should be acted upon by such third person in the manner that occasions the injury or loss, and provided the injury be the immediate and...

...its work ; it was exhausted." The doctrine is that there is no liability unless it appears that such false representation was made with the intent that it should be acted upon by such third person in the manner that occasions the injury or loss.26 The English Gun Case26 shows the limitation...

...or loss." And thirdly, he continues: "But to bring it within the principle, the injury, I apprehend, must be the immediate and not the remote consequence of the representation thus made. To render a man responsible for the consequences of a false representation made by him to...

...upon which a third person acts, and BO acting is injured or damnified — provided it appear that such false representation was made with the intent that it should be acted upon by suci third person in the manner that occasions the injury or loss ('«). Thirdly. The injury must be...

...should be acted upon by such third person in tho manner that occasions the injury or loss ('/). Thirdly. The injury must be the immediate and not the remote consequence of the representation thus made " (b). But these rules, it will be observed, arc stated chiefly, and the second of them exclusively,...

...meeting. 2. Directors of a company arc personally liable for injury caused by false representations, but the injury must be the immediate, and not the remote consequence of the representtition. JOHNSON, J. This case might bave been disposed of before, if the record had been before...

...upon which a third person acts, and so acting is injured or damnified; provided it appear that such false representation was made with the intent that it should be acted upon by such third person in the manner that occasions the injury or loss, and provided also that the injury so sustained...