Dualisms: The Agon of the Modern EraUniversity of Toronto Press, 2007 M12 8 - 472 pages Dualism is a motif that runs through literature of all genres and historical contexts, inspiring argumentation at the highest level and showing the formation of ideas in association as a creative exchange. It arises with special pertinence in western literature since the Renaissance and Reformation. In Dualisms, noted scholar Ricardo J. Quinones considers four major intellectual encounters: Erasmus and Luther, Voltaire and Rousseau, Turgenev and Dostoevsky, and Sartre and Camus. These four instances, Quinones argues, are important for what they are and what they represent: major intellectual contests that created the modern era and remain the 'agons' of our time. Through in-depth analysis, this study looks at the clarifications that emerged from four famous polemics. Discerning an 'itinerary of their encounters,' Quinones suggests a shared paradigm of development that is true for each of the examples of dualism. In all four cases, the two participants represented the vanguard of their time, and all of the debates started from shared intellectual positions until subsequent events revealed substantially different temperaments. It is the inescapable tension and connection between prior affinities and the discord of debate that continue to intrigue us. Dualisms is a tour-de-force, encompassing intellectual history, philosophy, theology, and literary criticism. It provides fresh perspectives on some of the most famous intellectual debates in all of literature, and considers the implications that they continue to have for the study of the humanities in the modern world. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 44
... Christ's words are chilling and challenging : ' Think not that I am come to send peace on earth ; I came not to ... Christ's birth ( Luke 2.14 ) . Given their temperamental diver- gences , Erasmus and Luther were able to understand the ...
... Christ . Why and whence have we that intermediate and neutral thing , the power of free choice , which although it is not Christ or the way , the truth and the life , still must not be error , or a lie , or death ? For unless everything ...
... Christ was unique . Ignorant of the later researches that would reveal traditions upon which Christ relied and of which he might have been the product , Rousseau under- scores the difference between the hero of Greek thought and Christ ...
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
Erasmus and Luther First and Foremost a Pattern | 23 |
Voltaire and Rousseau Never a Peace | 98 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown