Small States in International Relations
Jessica Beyer, Christine Ingebritsen, Sieglinde Gstohl, Iver B. Neumann
University of Washington Press, 2006 - Всего страниц: 334
Smaller nations have a special place in the international system, with a striking capacity to defy the expectations of most observers and many prominent theories of international relations. This volume of classic essays highlights the ability of small states to counter power with superior commitment, to rely on tightly knit domestic institutions with a shared "ideology of social partnership," and to set agendas as "norm entrepreneurs." The volume is organized around themes such as how and why small states defy expectations of realist approaches to the study of power; the agenda-setting capacity of smaller powers in international society and in regional governance structures such as the European Union; and how small states and representatives from these societies play the role of norm entrepreneurs in world politics -- from the promotion of sustainable solutions to innovative humanitarian programs and policies.
Christine Ingebritsenis associate professor of Scandinavian studies and associate dean of undergraduate education, University of Washington, Seattle.Iver B. Neumannis director of research at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Oslo, Norway.Sieglinde Gstohlis professor of European politics and administration at the College of Europe, Bruges, Belgium.Jessica Beyeris a doctoral candidate at the University of Washington. The other contributors include Annette Baker Fox, Jorri Duursma, Michael Handel, Peter J. Katzenstein, Dan Reiter, Baldur Thorhallsson, and David Vital.
Результаты 1 – 3 из 49
In order to account for the exemplary success of these countries in the 1970s ,
some propose explanations that reflect what a friend of mine calls the Seven
Dwarf Theory of Central Europe : the Austrians and the Swiss are both so
Indeed , social psychology would predict that since alliance policy is the
centerpiece of a minor power's wartime foreign policy , it will be assigned
responsibility for success or failure in the war , perhaps even if the minor's
alliance choice was ...
-If a minor power attempted neutrality in a systemic war and was not invaded
during the war , the experience is considered a success ; otherwise , it is a failure.
24 -If a minor power attempted being allied , was on the winning side , and was
Отзывы - Написать отзыв
Small Power in International Relations
Не показаны другие разделы: 4