This cannot be accomplished, however, without the help of the United

States Government.

While I strongly believe that it is in the national security interest of

our Government to have a strong merchant marine and maritime

industry, it is not what I believe that matters. It is what you in Congress,

and what the Administration think and believe that matters.

Should

you determine that it is in our national security interest to

have a commercial fleet of militarily useful ships -- owned, built,

crewed, and controlled by Americans -- to serve as a military auxiliary

in times of war and national emergency, a financial investment will be

required. A simple band-aid, like the extension of the existing Maritime

Security Program or the changes MSP shipowners recommend, will

neither save nor foster an American merchant marine to meet our

nation's sovereign military requirements in time of war and national

emergency.

As this chart demonstrates, in 1980, the U.S. merchant marine fleet

engaged in international commerce numbered 165 American owned,

American built, and American controlled ships, employing 13,313

Arecan Tachant marinets. Today, the active fleet numbers 45 ships,

picyir.g 2.660) Tariners. Similarly, in 1980 there were 22 shipyards

engaged in the construction of oceangoing commercial and naval ships

anploying 140,000 people. Today, there are just eight shipyards

Today, ninety-nine percent of the ships in the MSP fleet are

foreign-built, and 87 percent are foreign owned. It is just a matter of

time until there will be only two – and quite possibly - just one company

left in this fleet. These companies are Neptune Orient Lines of

Singapore and Maersk of Denmark.

The current MSP program has not achieved the intended

objectives. By all measurement, the U.S. merchant marine is worse off

today than 10-20 years ago.

If Congress reauthorizes the existing MSP program, the

Department of Defense will have no say in the types of ships these

companies enroll in the MSP program. They may have little or no

military utility, and there will be no assurance that when the going gets

tough that these ships will be available to the Department of Defense.

To address these serious deficiencies in the Maritime Security

Program, we propose that the Department of Defense pay for the design

and construction of ships over a multi-year construction period. The

general types, tonnage, and numbers of each ship type would be

identified by the Transportation Command, in consultation with the

Maritime Administration, to meet DOD sustainment lift requirements.

Under this program, DOD would request proposals annually from

U.S. citizen ship operators for commercial ships meeting the general

description and functionality required by DOD. The U.S. citizen

operator would enter into a contractual agreement with DOD, based on

the design selected by the operator, to lease the commercial vessel over a

twenty-year period. DOD would then pay for the construction of that

ship in a U.S. shipyard. Lease payments by the operator to DOD would

commence on the date of delivery of the vessel.

The lease payments to DOD would be based on the international

bareboat charter rate for a comparable vessel. Lease payments to DOD

could be made on a monthly basis. While the contractual length of the

lease would be for 20-years, the contract could either be at a fixed rate

for 20 years, or alternatively, provide for an annual adjustment of the

lease payment to reflect any increase or decrease in international charter

rates.

л
u

This program is a win-win-win for commercial U.S. ship operators,

DOD, U.S. crews, and U.S. shipbuilders. U.S. operators, which are

sinancially hard pressed to invest in new ships – no matter where they

are built -- would have access to ships at international prices, without

having to finance the up-front capital investment.

Under this program, the Department of Defense would own the

ships ensuring their utility and availability in times of emergency. This

program would strengthen the U.S. defense shipbuilding and repair

industrial base, and create thousands of long-term jobs for skilled

craftsmen essential to building both commercial and naval ships.

While DOD would have to finance the construction of the fleet, it

would realize savings in the costs of naval ships. Shipbuilding

generated by this program would enable us to achieve series production

in our shipyards and supplier base. Increased production would drive

down the unit cost of ships and ship systems under this program as our

workforce becomes more efficient with each ship of the same design we

produce. This building program would foster insertion of commercial

technologies and manufacturing processes in naval shipbuilding