The Monitoring of Weapons Development in Iraq, as Required by U.N. Security Council Resolution 687 (April 3, 1991); and Reaffirming the Special Relationship Between the U.S. and the Republic of Philippines: Markup Before the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, First Session on H.J. Res. 75 and H. Con. Res. 273, December 12, 2001, Volume 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002 - 40 pages |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abu Sayaff ACKERMAN allies amendment attack on Iraq Berman biological weapons BLOOMER bomb California cease-fire Chairman HYDE Committee comply Council Resolution 687 DANA ROHRABACHER develop weapons Gallegly GILMAN Gracia Burnham Gulf H. J. Res HOUGHTON inspec inspection Iran Iraq is violating Iraq without provocation Iraq's Iraqi involvement ISSA Joint Resolution Kingdom of Saudi Kuwait Lantos LEACH Martin Burnham mass destruction material and unacceptable Middle East military Mohamad Atta monitoring of weapons Muslims Mutual Defense Treaty Nations Security Council Nations weapons inspectors nuclear weapons Osama bin Laden peace and security Philippines Republic required by United Resolution 687 April response ROHRABACHER Ron Paul Saddam Hussein Saudi Arabia Security Council Resolution September 11th SMITH OF MICHIGAN Spertzel terrorist groups Thank tion U.N. resolution U.N. Security Council unacceptable breach United Nations Security United Nations weapons votes yes weap weapons development weapons of mass weapons program Whereas Iraq Whereas on January Whereas Security Council
Popular passages
Page 39 - President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
Page 12 - The law specifically stated that "it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.
Page 15 - Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from California (Mr.
Page 11 - Commission, which shall carry out immediate on-site inspection of Iraq's biological, chemical and missile capabilities, based on Iraq's declarations and the designation of any additional locations by the Special Commission itself; (ii) The yielding by Iraq of possession to the Special Commission for destruction, removal or rendering harmless...
Page 11 - Iraq shall unconditionally accept the destruction, removal, or rendering harmless, under international supervision, of: a) all chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and manufacturing facilities...
Page 13 - Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make: Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.
Page 12 - On August 14, 1998, President Clinton signed Public Law 105-235, which declared that "the Government of Iraq is in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations" and urged the President "to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations.".
Page 11 - carry out immediate on-site inspection of Iraq's biological, chemical and missile capabilities, based on Iraq's declarations and the designation of any additional locations by the Special Commission itself.
Page 6 - States. 1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 2 of the United States of America in...
Page 28 - Those in favor signify by saying aye. All those opposed, no. The ayes have it. The Amendment is agreed to. The question occurs now on HR 3489 as amended. Those in favor signify saying aye. All those opposed, no.