No Litmus Test: Law Versus Politics in the Twenty-first Century

Передняя обложка
Rowman & Littlefield, 2006 - Всего страниц: 295
The courts and, indeed, the law itself are under assault from both right and left. By analyzing the most pressing controversies of our day, No Litmus Test defends the possibility of principled legal decision-making against the attacks of both the right and the left. From Bush v. Gore to the war in Iraq, No Litmus Test demonstrates that even when the law provides no clear-cut right answers, it offers tools for distinguishing good arguments from bad ones.

Результаты поиска по книге

Содержание

The Difference between Law and Politics
1
They Are All Activists Now
3
Is There a Distinction between Law and Politics? Yes and the Bush v Gore Decision Proves It
9
Clarence Thomass Challenge to the Rehnquist Courts Vision of Representative Government
17
Does Federal Tort Reform Unduly Infringe State Sovereignty?
21
Aid and Comfort to the Enemy
27
The Supreme Court Case that Pits Free Speech against ChurchState Separation
29
How Abortion Politics Impedes Clear Thinking on Other Issues Involving Fetuses
35
Bush Loses in the Supreme Court and America Wins
151
Is Iraq in Material Breach of Its Obligations under the UN Resolution? A Geopolitical Question Not Simply a Legal One
155
Is the War on Iraq Lawful?
161
Why Congressional Power to Declare War Does Not Provide an Effective Check on the President
169
Kerry Stands by His Iraq War Vote and with Bush against Constitutional Law Principles
175
The Global Village
183
When American States Execute Citizens of Foreign Countries The Case of Gerardo Valdez
185
Can One Nation Arrest the Foreign Minister of Another? The World Court Says No
191

Why the Lawsuit Challenging Tennessees Choose Life License Plates Should Fail
41
Three Bad Reasons and One Very Good Reason to Oppose a Constitutional Amendment Barring SameSex Marriage
47
A Federal Appeals Court Rules that Universities Can Bar Military Recruiters without Losing Federal Grant Money A Welcome Result Based on Flawe...
55
Justice Scalias Persuasive but Elitist Response to the Duck Hunting Controversy
61
Can a State Make It a Crime to Refuse to Identify Yourself to the Police? In a Narrow Ruling the Supreme Court Says Yes
65
Why Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and Other 527 Organizations Cant Be Silenced
71
Does the Constitution Permit the Blue States to Secede? With Permission Perhaps Unilaterally No
77
How the Schiavo Federal Court Case Might Have Been Won
85
In Defense of Liberal Judging
93
Washington Yankees in King Arthurs Court The Supreme Court Journeys to EighteenthCentury England to Define the Rights of TwentyFirstCentury ...
95
How a Recent Unanimous Supreme Court Public Housing Decision Exiles Compassion from the Province of Judging
105
Could Justice Scalias Affirmative Action Dissent Become a SelfFulfilling Prophecy?
111
Is There a Constitutional Right to Sexual Privacy? Finding None a Federal Appeals Court Upholds Alabamas Sex Toy Prohibition
117
Liberty Security and War
125
What Is an Unlawful Combatant and Why It Matters The Status of Detained alQaeda and Taliban Fighters
129
The Justice Departments Change of Heart Regarding Torture A FairMinded and Praiseworthy Analysis that Could Have Gone Still Further
135
Who Decides Whether Yaser Hamdi or Any Other Citizen Is an Enemy Combatant?
143
Should Foreigners Be Permitted to Make Campaign Contributions to US Candidates? Surprisingly the Answer May Be Yes
197
The Hidden International Influence in the Supreme Court Decision Barring Executions of the Mentally Retarded
203
The Use of Foreign Law in American Constitutional Interpretation A Revealing Colloquy between Justices Scalia and Breyer
211
Can Ethnic Hatred Be Eliminated by Eliminating Ethnicity? The Rwanda Experiment
219
What a Chinese Height Discrimination Case Says about Chinese and American Constitutional Law
225
The Rule of Lawyers
233
Debate over an ABA Legal Ethics Rule Underscores Lawyers Competing Obligations to Keep Secret and to Disclose
237
Can the Legal Profession Improve Its Image? Americans Believe Lawyers Are Necessary but Dishonest Survey Finds
243
Americans Faith in the Supreme Court and in the Constitution Survey Shows Bush v Gores Effect Was Limited
251
Whose Constitution Is It Anyway? What Americans Dont Know about the Constitution and Why It Matters
259
Unsolicited Advice to Law School Applicants With Prospects Newly Limited Be Sure You Want to Become a Lawyer
267
How to Think Like a Lawyer Advice to New and Prospective Law Students
273
Appendix
279
Table of Cases
283
Index
289
About the Author
293
Авторские права

Другие издания - Просмотреть все

Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения

Об авторе (2006)

Michael C. Dorf is the Michael I. Sovern Professor of Law at Columbia University School of Law. He is the editor of Constitutional Law Stories (2004) and coauthor, with Laurence H. Tribe, of On Reading the Constitution (1991). He clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy (1991-1992) and Judge Stephen Reinhardt of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1990-1991).

Библиографические данные