PREPARED STATEMENT OF MAUREEN E. NERLI, VIETNAM CIVILIAN VOLUNTEER, BURLINGAME, CA IT SEEMS ALL TOO EASY TO FORGET THE DEDICATED AND COURAGEOUS ROLE OF THE 10,000 AMERICAN WOMEN WHO VOLUNTEERED FOR CIVILIAN SERVICE IN VIETNAM WITH THE U.S.O., AMERICAN RED CROSS AND OTHER AGENCIES. WHY MUST OUR PART IN THE VIETNAM CONFLICT BE REMEMBERED UNDER "MISCELLEANOUS" IN HISTORY BOOKS? WHEN THE GOING WAS TOUGH, WHEN OUR COUNTRY NEEDED US, WE FORGOT THE RISK, THE DANGER AND VOLUNTEERED FOR SERVICE. DESPITE OUR PERSONAL OPINIONS OF THE WAR, WE WERE THERE TO HELP IN ANY WAY WE COULD. THERE WAS A JOB TO DO AND WE GLADLY DID IT. MANY OF THESE WOMEN, IT MUST BE NOTED, HAD TO PAY FOR THEIR OWN AIRFARE TO VIETNAM. THE MONEY WAS TAKEN OUT OF THEIR MONTHLY PAYCHECKS. SUCH VALOR MUST NOT CONTINUE TO BE IGNORED. RECOGNITION FOR A SERVICE IN VIETNAM MUST BE OUR MEDAL OF HONOR. IT IS LONG OVERDUE, GENTLEMEN, LONG OVERDUE. ARE WE IGNORED BECAUSE WE ARE NOT CLASSIFIED AS VETERANS IN THE FEDERAL MEANING OF THE TERM? WELL, THEN, GIVE US VETERANS STATUS AND THAT PROBLEM WILL BE SOLVED. WHY SHOULDN'T WE RECEIVE THAT STATUS, WE SERVED OUR COUNTRY DIDN'T WE? MANY OF THE WOMEN CIVILIANS ARE TODAY SUFFERING FROM PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL AGENCY'S EFFORTS IN VIETNAM. WHY THEN ARE THE PERSONNEL WHO SERVED THESE AGENCIES ONLY YOU CAN CHANGE THAT ACT OF DISCRIMMINATION, GENTLEMEN. YOU MUST ALSO REMEMBER THAT WHEN WE SERVED IN VIETNAM WE RECEIVED THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE IDENTIFICATION THAT IN ESSENCE READ: ".(SHE)....is a civilian non-combatant serving with the Armed Forces of the United States. designating grade, rate or rank, the DOD identification is that of Warrant Officer-Captain, Military Service: USA." IF, THEN, OUR SERVICE WAS OF A MILITARY NATURE, WHY MUST WE FACE DISCRIMMINATION IN SO FAR AS THE AGENT ORANGE SITUATION, GOVERNOR DUKEMEJIAN OF CALIFORNIA MINUTE. WE WOMEN CIVILIAN VIETNAM VETERANS, WHO SERVED WITH THE U.S.O., AMERICAN RED CROSS 37-524 0-84-31 GRANTED THERE IS A LONG ROAD TO TRAVEL ON THIS ISSUE. ATTENTION MUST BE PAID TO THROUGHOUT AMERICAN OUR NEEDS. IGNORING THE PROBLEM WILL NOT MAKE IT GO AWAY. THANK YOU. Maureen Herli MAUREEN E. NERLI 2460 Poppy Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 (415) 347-2007 SERVED AS ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF THE TAN SON NHUT U.S.O IN VIETNAM ILLIAM S. COHEN MAINE United States Senate WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510 April 11, 1984 The Honorable Alan K. Simpson Committee on Veterans Affairs Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Al: I am writing to thank you and the entire Committee membership for providing Senator Mitchell and myself with an opportunity to use today's legislative hearing on Veterans Health Care to focus on the concerns that rural veterans in Maine have about the availability of authorized Veterans Administration (VA) health-care services. On March 29, in preparation for today's hearing, Senator Mitchell wrote to Harry Walters and outlined several questions that we would like to have answered by the VA regarding this issue. It is my hope that the Veterans Administration will address these questions in its testimony today so that Senator Mitchell and I may proceed with our plans to offer legislation that will begin to address Maine veterans' concerns during the Committee markup of a health bill on May 2. The legislation that we are proposing would accomplish two things. As Senator Mitchell's bill S.523 would do, our bill would provide for an experimental rural health-care program for eligible veterans in Aroostook County in northern Maine. In this regard, I am pleased to see that the Administration's Fiscal Year 1985 VA budget includes $105,000 to determine the costeffectiveness of providing health care for rural veterans in several rural health centers in Maine. This project has received initial approval from both the VA medical center at Togus, Maine and the VA in Washington and it is our intention to see that Aroostook County veterans can participate in that or some other experimental program this year. Our bill will also require the VA to develop statistics that would allow the Committee to determine the true extent of the problem that the VA has in providing adaquate health-care services to eligible veterans who live in other rural areas of the country. During hearings on S.523 last July, Senator Mitchell amply demonstrated that eligible rural veterans in Maine use VA health-care services much less frequently than do veterans who live short distances from Togus. In Maine, statistics indicate that when rural The Honorable Alan K. Simpson Page two veterans finally do come to the VA for medical assistance their problems are usually more severe than are those of other veterans. The result of this inequitable situation seems to be extended stays at Togus, with higher costs for the VA health-care system. Because the VA has been unable to provide comparable statistics for rural veterans in other areas of the country, Senator Mitchell and I believe that it is time for the VA to develop those statistics. We also believe that it is time for the VA to focus upon cost-effective health-care alternatives for rural veterans in Maine and in other portions of the country. The establishment of an experimental health-care project in northern Maine this year would be an important first step in this process. Again, thank you for your assistance in allowing me to explore these important alternatives with the Committee and with the VA. With warm regards, I am WSC/jhk Sincerely, William S. Cohen |