Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

Appendix 2. Material submitted by witnesses-Continued
Item 1-From Mr. Lawrence Bartlett-Continued

State Agency Directors of USDA Midwest Region: Comments,
suggestions, objections, and questions concerning the Food and
Nutrition Service__.

Item 2-From Senator Hart:

Page

1856

Letter from Howard W. Briggs, director, Detroit Public Schools__
Letter from Mrs. Richard Parsaca and Mrs. Ronald Vance, Mich-
igan School Lunch Committee_____

1860

1862

Item 3-From Senator Cook:

Letter from Mrs. Helen A. Davis, food service director, Todd
County (Ky.) Board of Education_-_

1863

Letter from C. W. Bevins, director, Division of School Food
Service, Department of Education, Commonwealth of Ken-
tucky

1863

Letter from Harold Garrison, superintendent; and Jane Watts,
school food service director, Fulton County (Ky.) Schools____ 1864
Letter from Doris Watts, director, Campbell County (Ky.)
Schools Lunchrooms__

1864

Item 4-From Josephine Martin:

Statement of Jack P. Nix, Georgia State Superintendent of
Schools, and Coordinator, School Food Service Committee,
Council of Chief State School Officers__

1865

Appendix 3. Material submitted by others than witnesses:

Open Letter to Secretary Lyng, by John Perryman, for publication in
the October issue of School Foodservice Journal_.
Statement of the National Milk Producers Federation__

1869

1870

From Representative Dr. William R. Roy (D-2d Dist., Kansas). Appendix 4. Articles of interest:

1871

News previous to the hearing:

August 25, 1971:

The Washington Evening Star: "McGovern Asks Lifting of
School-Lunch Rules".

1873

August 26, 1971:

The Denver Post: "McGovern Charges: 'Top Brass' Blamed
for Lunch Cuts".

1874

The Washington Post: "McGovern Joins Protest: More Money
Asked for School Lunches".

1875

August 28, 1971:

The Providence (R.I.) Evening Bulletin: "Lunch Cuts Hit
Schools"

1876

The Providence (R.I.) Journal: "Skimping on School

Lunches"

1878

The Washington Post: "Hunger In The Classroom”.

1878

August 29, 1971:

The Providence Sunday Journal: "No School Lunch Expan-
sion"

1879

August 30, 1971:

The New York Times: "Federal School Lunch Plan Fails To
Help 1.9 Million Poor Pupils"-

1879

August 31, 1971:

The Associated Press, Wire Release: By Austin Scott--
The Washington Post: "Lunch Squabble" (excerpt from Jack
Anderson's "Washington Merry-Go-Round") –

1880

1881

September 3, 1971:

The Washington Post: "U.S. Cutting School Lunch Funds"-- 1886 September 6, 1971:

The New York Times: "Feeding Hungry Children".

1887

News subsequent to hearing:

September 8, 1971:

The New York Times: "McGovern Scores Pupil Lunch
Plan"

1888

The Washington Evening Star: "Federal Changes Won't Hurt
Area School Lunch Program".

1889

"School Lunch Crunch".

1890

The Washington Post: "U.S. Denies Cutting School Lunch

Funds"

1890

V

Appendix 4. Articles of interest-Continued
News subsequent to hearing-Continued
September 9, 1971:

The Berkeley (Calif.) Post: "New Regulations Menace School
Lunch Programs”.

Page

1891

U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs:
"Dear Colleague Letter".

1892

"44 Senators Request President's Intervention in School
Lunch Crisis".

1892

The Washington Post: Herblock cartoon: "Got To Teach 'Em
the Value of a Dollar".

1895

September 10, 1971:

The Providence (R.I.) Evening Bulletin: "Curb on Lunches
Hits 56,500 in Rhode Island".

1895

Station KOWH, Omaha, Nebr.: An Editorial by Mrs. Wini-
fred Peterson, chairman, Welfare Task Force, Urban
League of Nebraska_.

1897

September 11, 1971:

The Washington Food Report: "Furor Over School Lunch
Funding"

1898

September 16, 1971:

The New York Post: "44 Senators Fight School Lunch
Cut"

1899

The Wall Street Journal: "Nixon's Diet for Pupils: Agency
Seeks Curb on School-Lunch Funds; Stiff Quiz is Likely by
Senate Panel Today".

1899

The Daily Mail (Hagerstown, Md.): "44 Senators Urge Nixon
To Scrap Proposed School-Lunch Regulations".

1901

September 28, 1971:

The Washington Evening Star: "Showdown on School
Lunches Set".

1902

September 29, 1971:

Letter from the White House to Hon. George McGovern from
Eugene S. Cowen, Deputy Assistant to the President_‒‒‒‒
October 2, 1971:

1903

The New York Times: "Senate Acts To Force Rise in Aid
for School Lunches".

1904

October 3, 1971:

The New York Times: "Lunches for Hungry Children”.
October 7, 1971:

1905

The Wall Street Journal: "Administration To Lift School
Lunch Fund $135 Million But Tightens Eligibility Rules".
The Washington Post: "U.S. Retains Lunch Share, Cuts
584,000 Off Program".

1906

1907

The New York Times: "U.S. Increases Pupil Lunch Aid But
Tightens Rule on Eligibility”.

1908

October 8, 1971:

The New York Times: "Fudge for Lunch”.

1909

The Washington Post: Herblock cartoon: "New Play in the
Big Game Plan Against the Kids".

1910

October 9, 1971:

The Washington Post: "Taking Back the Lunch Money".
October 10, 1971:

1910

The New York Times: "U.S. Tightens Rule on Free
Lunches"

1911

October 13, 1971:

The Washington Evening Star: "New Challenge Set on Lunch
Program"

1912

October 15, 1971:

U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human
Needs, press release: "59 Senators Write President Urging
Withdrawal of School Lunch Regulations That Would De-
prive 1.5 Million Children of Lunches".

1913

The New York Times: "Nixon's Own Expert Criticizes Cut-
back in School Lunches".

1916

The Wall Street Journal: "House Panel Approves Unani-
mously Boosting School-Lunch Spending"-

1917

Appendix 4. Articles of interest-Continued
News subsequent to hearing-Continued

The Washington Post: "Congressional Report: House Unit
Restores Lunch Program".

Page

1917

October 16, 1971:

The Washington Post: "School Lunch Edict Hit by 59

Senators"

1918

October 17, 1971:

The New York Times: "School Lunches: The Script Called
for Some Empty Trays"-

1918

The Washington Post: "Unresolved Question: Will the Gov-
ernment Feed the Hungry?"_

1919

October 18, 1971:

The Washington Post: "Nixon Orders Clarifying of School
Lunch Rules".

1920

October 19, 1971:

The Washington Evening Star: "Agriculture Bows to Critics,
Ends School Lunch Cutback".

1921

The Washington Post: "U.S. Drops Cut in School Lunch
Plan"

1921

The New York Times: "House Orders Nixon Aides Not to Cut
Pupil Lunches"-

1922

The Wall Street Journal: "Administration Cancels Attempts
to Pare School-Lunch System by Curbing Eligibility".

[blocks in formation]

The Washington Post: "Congressional Report: School Lunch
Bill Approved”-

1925

October 22, 1971:

The Washington Post: "The Free Lunch Reversal".

1925

November 7, 1971:

The Washington Post: "Excerpt from Article by Carroll
Kilpatrick"

1926

November 8, 1971:

Associated Press Dispatch: "School Lunch Budget”

1926

Appendix 5. Supplemental information to the hearing:

Passage of Senate Joint Resolution 157:

From the Congressional Record, Oct. 1, 1971:

Free Lunches-Reduced Price Lunches for Needy Children 1929 From the Congressional Record, Oct. 15, 1971:

School Lunch Regulations_

Passage of Senate Joint Resolution 923:

From the Congressional Record, Oct. 18, 1971:

1987

School Lunch and Breakfast Programs for Needy Children-- 1989 Message from the House of Representatives on House Joint Resolution 923:

From the Congressional Record, Oct. 20, 1971:

Free or Reduced Price Lunches for Needy Schoolchildren___ 2014

CRISIS IN THE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1971

U.S. SENATE

SELECT COMMITTEE ON
NUTRITION AND HUMAN NEEDS

Washington, D.C.

The Select Committee met at 10 a.m., pursuant to call, in room 1114, of the New Senate Office Building, the Honorable George McGovern, chairman of the committee, presiding.

. Present: Senators McGovern, Hart, and Cook.

Staff members present: Kenneth Schlossberg, staff director; Gerald S. J. Cassidy, general counsel; and Judah Sommer, minority counsel.

OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR MCGOVERN, CHAIRMAN

Senator McGOVERN. The committee will please come to order. Today's hearing deals with the proposed regulations of August 13 which reduce the reimbursement rate to 35 cents for free and reducedprice school lunches.

Over the last 2 weeks the Select Committee has been besieged by literally hundreds of State and local school lunch directors and by community representatives of all kinds, with urgent requests that we hold a hearing on the proposed regulations at the earliest possible date.

I cannot recall any time since this committee has been in operation when there has been such an outcry against a proposed regulation as we have heard over the past 2 weeks. Thirty-seven State school lunch directors, meeting in Minneapolis on August 5 through 7, unanimously condemned the new regulations and have called upon this committee to hold these hearings today.

BASIC POINT OF DISAGREEMENT

There is one basic point of disagreement that we are going to deal with in today's hearings. The question is very sharply drawn, and it is just that single issue that we will be looking at: The August 13th regulations which the Department of Agriculture claims are designed to assist the States to do a better job in carrying out the congressional intent of Public Law 91-248, that every eligible child "shall be served meals free or at a reduced cost;" and, on the other hand, the point of view of the State school lunch directors' unanimous position that this new regulation will bring the School Lunch Program-in their words "to a screeching halt."

(1747)

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »