 Shakespear was no moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest of all moralists. He was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He shewed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling...  The Quarterly Review - Page 4591818Full view - About this book
 | Ernest Bernbaum - 1949 - 376 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | William Hazlitt - 1960 - 392 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Herschel Baker - 1962 - 566 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Herschel Baker - 1962 - 562 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | David Bromwich - 1983 - 480 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Harold Bloom - 1985 - 544 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| |
