 Shakespear was no moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest of all moralists. He was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one. He taught what he had learnt from her. He shewed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling...  The Quarterly Review - Page 4591818Full view - About this book
 | Marvin A. Carlson - 1993 - 564 pages
...moralist at all," says Hazlitt, writing on Measure for Measure. "In another he was the greatest of moralists. He was a moralist in the same sense in which nature is one." The genius of Shakespeare was for sympathetic identification "with human nature in all its shapes,... | |
 | Lucy Beckett - 2006 - 668 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Lucy Beckett - 2006 - 668 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Michael O'Neill, Mark Sandy - 2006 - 412 pages
...his was to shew that 'there is some soul of goodness in things evil.' ... In one sense, Shakespear was no moralist at all: in another, he was the greatest of all moralists. ... He shewed the greatest knowledge of humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling for it. (HW iv. 346-7) As... | |
 | William Hazlitt - 1907 - 312 pages
...himself, and pleads his own cause, as well as if counsel had been assigned him. In one sense, Shakespear was no moralist at all : in another, he was the greatest...humanity with the greatest fellow-feeling for it. One of the most dramatic passages in the present play is the interview between Claudio and his sister,... | |
 | 1961 - 834 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| |
