Deterrence - the promise of massive retaliation against nations - means nothing against shadowy terrorist networks with no nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver... The Iraq War Reader: History, Documents, Opinions - Стр. 269авторы: Christopher Cerf - 2003 - Страниц: 736Ограниченный просмотр - Подробнее о книге
| James Risen - 2006 - Страниц: 273
...weapons of mass destruction. "Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies," Bush told the graduating class at West Point. "We cannot defend America and our friends by hoping for... | |
| Laura Neack - 2007 - Страниц: 274
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies.13 Then, in the September 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States of America, the... | |
| Steven Rosefielde, D. Quinn Mills - 2007 - Страниц: 580
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies.18 Is President Bush a master of illusion? Certainly, if American policy in the Middle East... | |
| John Davis - 2006 - Страниц: 330
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies."61 Of course, deterrence and containment per se are not Cold War doctrines, and there is no... | |
| Kennedy Graham, Tânia Felício - 2006 - Страниц: 363
...sense and self-defense, America will act against such emerging threats before they are fully formed. We cannot defend America and our friends by hoping for the best. So we must be prepared to defeat our enemies' plans, using the best intelligence and proceeding with... | |
| James A. Tyner - 2006 - Страниц: 168
...sense and self-defense, American will act against such emerging threats before they are fully formed. We cannot defend America and our friends by hoping for the best. So we must be prepared to defeat our enemies' plans, using the best intelligence and proceeding with... | |
| Lyle Goldstein - 2006 - Страниц: 292
...[W]e will oppose them with all of our power." Unveiling the principle of preemption, Bush asserted, "We cannot defend America and our friends by hoping for the best. ... If we wait for threats to fully materialize, then we will have waited too long."1 The importance... | |
| Roger A. Pielke, Jr - 2007 - Страниц: 198
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles...solemnly sign non-proliferation treaties, and then systemically break them. If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long.... | |
| Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, Pamela R. Aall - 2007 - Страниц: 766
...nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies." 26. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 (September 28, 2001). 27. United Nations High-Level... | |
| Patrick J. Buchanan - 2007 - Страниц: 316
...deterrence that had won the Cold War. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies. ... If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long. . . . [T]he war on terror... | |
| |