 | Laura Neack - 2007 - Страниц: 274
...Instead, they rely on acts of terror and, potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction — weapons that can be easily concealed, delivered covertly, and used without warning. . . . The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to... | |
 | Alan M. Dershowitz - 2006 - Страниц: 374
...enemies' reliance "on acts of terror and, potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction — weapons that can be easily concealed, delivered covertly, and used without warning." The paper pointed to 9/1 1 as proving that the infliction of "mass civilian casualties is the specific... | |
 | Ronald J. Pestritto, Thomas G. West - 2007 - Страниц: 358
...Instead. they rely on acts of terror and. potentially. the use of weapons of mass destruction — weapons that can be easily concealed. delivered covertly. and used without warning. . . . The greater the threat the greater is the risk of inaction— and the more compelling the case tor taking... | |
 | Richard Sorabji, David Rodin - 2006 - Страниц: 270
...Instead, they rely on acts of terror and, potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction - weapons that can be easily concealed, delivered covertly, and used without warning. . . . The greater the threat, the greater the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking... | |
 | Robert G. Kaufman - 2007 - Страниц: 263
...such attacks would fail. Instead, they rely on acts of terror and, potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction—weapons that can be easily concealed, delivered covertly, and used without warning. demonstrated by the losses on September 11, 2001, mass civilian casualties is the specific objective... | |
 | David B. MacDonald, Robert G. Patman, Betty Mason-Parker - 2007 - Страниц: 280
...Instead, they rely on acts of terror and, potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction - weapons that can be easily concealed, delivered covertly, and used without warning. . . . The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to... | |
 | Greg Cashman, Leonard C. Robinson - 2007 - Страниц: 436
...Instead, they rely on acts of terror and, potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction — weapons that can be easily concealed, delivered covertly, and used without warning. . . . The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive action to counter a sufficient threat to... | |
 | Страниц: 598
...know such attacks would fail. Instead, they rely on acts of terror and potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction-weapons that can be easily concealed, delivered covertly, and used without warning.5 4 The White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, 14-15... | |
| |
... concept of imminent threat to the capabilities and objectives of today's adversaries. Rogue states and terrorists do not seek to attack us using conventional means. They know such attacks would fail. Instead, they rely on acts of terror and, potentially,... 
