 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Intelligence - 2004 - Страниц: 532
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively." September 18, 2002... | |
 | Dominic McGoldrick - 2004 - Страниц: 396
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. The United States... | |
 | Nicolaus Mills, Michael Walzer - 2004 - Страниц: 373
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively." Given the depth of... | |
 | Benjamin R. Barber - 2003 - Страниц: 242
...technologies" — demand changed tactics: "The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary act preemptively." The document's logic... | |
 | Hans Martin Sieg - 2004 - Страниц: 452
...Militärschläge, das in ihr enthalten ist: »The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.« "9 Nach den herkömmlichen... | |
 | Frank P. Harvey - 2004 - Страниц: 372
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To fore-stall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. The United States... | |
 | Niels M. Blokker, N. J. Schrijver - 2011 - Страниц: 548
...sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack, To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.'78 Although anticipation... | |
 | Barry Buzan - 2004 - Страниц: 241
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. (Bush 2002: 6, 14,... | |
 | William J. Crotty - 2004 - Страниц: 340
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. (Bush 2002a) Many... | |
 | Andrea Bianchi, Yasmin Naqvi - 2004 - Страниц: 573
...States of America, at 15 available at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html>. of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack. The negative reaction by the majority of States in response to the United Kingdom's and the United... | |
| |
The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action... 
