 | Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Foreign Affairs Committee - 2004 - Страниц: 180
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack.553 420. The Prime Minister also hinted at his support for a reappraisal of anticipatory selfdefence... | |
 | Christian Walter, Silja Vöneky, Volker Röben, Frank Schorkopf - 2004 - Страниц: 1516
..."The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if uncertainty...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act pre-emptively." 146 For a prohibition... | |
 | Charles Tiefer - 2004 - Страниц: 466
...thirty-one pages covered much ground, with its central point reemphasizing preemption: the right to "anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if...remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack." 26 Preemption's justification rested on the claim that deterrence alone, the classic method of preventing... | |
 | Charles Tiefer - 2004 - Страниц: 456
...thirty-one pages covered much ground, with its central point reemphasizing preemption: the right to "anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if...uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack."26 Preemption's justification rested on the claim that deterrence alone, the classic method... | |
 | Arnold Schuchter - 2003 - Страниц: 377
...unacceptable level of risk for the United States and "a compelling case for taking anticipatory actions to defend ourselves, even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack." The bad news is that this broad-based doctrine of preemption and prevention carried with it very serious... | |
 | Hans Martin Sieg - 2004 - Страниц: 452
...Militärschläge, das in ihr enthalten ist: »The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even il uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such... | |
 | Peter A. French, Jason A. Short - 2005 - Страниц: 324
...country." In the section dealing with threats from weapons of mass destruction, the strategy stated: The United States has long maintained the option of...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. 2 These stark assertions... | |
 | Makere Stewart-Harawira - 2005 - Страниц: 290
...sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...United States will, if necessary, act pre-emptively. As the Centre for Defence Information (GDI) notes in its analysis, both strategies rely on knowledge... | |
 | Gary Rosen - 2005 - Страниц: 268
...pre-emptive action must now be adopted: The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. Another feature of... | |
 | Bernhard Vogel, Rudolf Dolzer, Matthias Herdegen - 2005 - Страниц: 238
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. Much has been said... | |
| |
The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action... 
