 | David H. Rosenbloom, Howard E. McCurdy - 2006 - Страниц: 252
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively."10 The immediate consequences... | |
 | Chae-Jin Lee - 2006 - Страниц: 374
...sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory-...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.40 This strategic assertion,... | |
 | Alan M. Dershowitz - 2006 - Страниц: 374
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively." By using the words... | |
 | Karl P. Mueller, Jasen J. Castillo, Forrest E. Morgan, Negeen Pegahi, Brian Rosen - 2006 - Страниц: 344
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. The United States... | |
 | Laura Neack - 2007 - Страниц: 274
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.14 The Bush doctrine... | |
 | Michael John Matheson - 2006 - Страниц: 460
...after an attack might occur: ". . . The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act pre-emptively."4 This assertion... | |
 | Chae-Jin Lee - 2006 - Страниц: 380
...sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.40 This strategic assertion,... | |
 | John Davis - 2006 - Страниц: 330
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction — and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.21 Thus, the "cold... | |
 | William C. Martel - 2006 - Страниц: 311
...threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory...of the enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hosNotes to Pages 228-31 tile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively."... | |
 | James E. Goodby - 2006 - Страниц: 244
...understanding Bush's nuclear weapons policies. It also codified Bush's preventive war thinking. It spoke of "taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even...remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack." Recognizing the dangers that lurked in these words, the authors of the National Security Strategy also... | |
| |
The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action... 
