...make is this Mr. SHROYEB. You throw out the common law rule of agency. All you have to do is read it. "Whether the specific acts performed were actually...or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." The statute itself says that the common law rule of agency is not applicable. Mr. JACOBS. Do you say,...

...determining whether any person is acting as an 'agent' of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether...or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." 7 Section 2 (6) defines commerce to include trade, etc., between a state and a territory or within...

...determining whether any person is acting as an 'agent' of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether...or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." 7 Section 2 (6) defines commerce to include trade, etc., between a state and a territory or within...

...Section 2, paragraph 13 now states, "In determining whether any person is acting as an 'agent' for another person so as to make such other persons responsible...or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." This Is certainly an extreme interpretation of the rule of agency and hns the effect of fixing responsibility...

...determining whether any person is acting as an 'agent' of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether...or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." (See also sec. 301 (e) of the Taft-Hartley law.) Unions have criticized this definition, claiming that...

...determining whether any person is acting as an agent of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, "the question of whether...or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." A similar double-edged provision on employer and union responsibility is included in section 301 of...

...whether any person is acting as an 'agent' of another person so as to make such other person resinmsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific...or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling. "NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD "SEO. 3. (a) The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called...

...person is acting as an "agent" of another person so as to make such other person responsible for bis acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed...or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling. This provision of the act fails to recognize the realities of collective bargaining and the realities...

...is done by including in the section wording which directs the Board to give secondary importance to the question of whether the specific acts performed...were actually authorized or subsequently ratified by the union concerned. In other words, the union can now be held responsible for any actions by individual...

...is done by including in the section wording which directs the Board to give secondary importance to the question of whether the specific acts performed...were actually authorized or subsequently ratified by the union concerned. In other words, the union can now be held responsible for any actions by individual...