...provision. In the case Ex parte Poulson, which arose upon a motion in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in...1835, in the cause of Drew v. Swift, for a rule on Ponlson, the editor of a daily paper, to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him...

...Pearson, 2 Bailey, 619. See Hun!.- of Pennsylvania v. Candy, 1 Hill, 209. 269. On a rule upon a sheriff to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for not paying over money collected on execution, he may defend himself by proving (by parol evidence)...

...been proclaimed. On the 27th March, Jackson appeared in the United States court to answer to a rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for a contempt of ' court. He offered a written defence, verified by his oath ; but the court would not even permit...

...him. MARCH 1, 1841. On this day, the relator produced the order of this Court, requiring the defendant to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him, for neglecting to return certain fee bills and executions for costs, heretofore committed to him for collection...

...•'dbturber. Complaint was made to the Court next day by the Sheriff, and a rule put upon i.ardiner to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for the contempt; wncreupon he filed an affidavit, in which he relied much upon the court's having been,...

...him for their production. As he took no notice of this order, the Court granted a rule calling on him to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for a contempt of Court L'i-.-l, QC, now showed cause, contending that, as Carter had ceased to be a director since...

...rule nisi had been obtained, calling on Mr. Espinasse, the judge of the County Court of Gravesend, to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for disobeying a writ of certiorari to remove an action of replevin from the County Court to the Superior...

...refused to make a rule absolute to attach the sheriff. This was a rule calling upon the sheriff of Surrey to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for not obeying the terms of an interpleader order, made by Mr. Baron Wilde. It appeared that on the 22nd...

...Hammersley «. Parker, 1 Bart. Ch., 25 ; SC, 3 .tV. T. Leg. Obt., 344. 96. An order requiring defendant to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for a contempt in not attending before a master, pursuant to an order of the court made in a creditor's suit, should...

...service of the previous order is made, and the court grants a further order, for the judgment debtor to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for the contempt of the order of the court. If he obey the second order, interrogatories may be administered...