 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs - 1986 - 258 pages
...suggested that the Clause not only grants Congress regulatory power over interstate commerce, but also "excludes, necessarily, the action of all others that...would perform the same operation on the same thing." Soon after Chief Justice Marshall's tenure, however, the Supreme Court began to expand the area in... | |
 | David P. Currie - 1992 - 518 pages
...that, as the word "to regulate" implies in its nature, full power over the thing to be regulated, it excludes, necessarily, the action of all others that...would perform the same operation on the same thing. . . . There is great force in this argument, and the court is not satisfied that it has been refuted.97... | |
 | Christopher Wolfe - 1994 - 472 pages
...powers upon which the welfare of the nation essentially depends," Gibbons and the argument that the power to regulate "excludes necessarily, the action...would perform the same operation on the same thing," Cohens and the possibility that a construction would "prostrate . . . the government and laws at the... | |
 | Jean Edward Smith - 1998 - 788 pages
...appellant, that, as the word, 'to regulate', implies . . . full power over the thing to be regulated, it excludes, necessarily, the action of all others that...would perform the same operation on the same thing. ... It produces a uniform whole, which is as much disturbed and deranged by changing what the regulating... | |
 | Ralph A. Rossum - 2001 - 324 pages
...not. As the word "to regulate" implies in its nature, full power over the thing to be regulated, it excludes, necessarily, the action of all others that...would perform the same operation on the same thing. That regulation is designed for the entire result, applying to those parts which remain as they were,... | |
 | R. Kent Newmyer - 2001 - 552 pages
..."that, as the word 'to regulate' implied in its nature, full power over the thing to be regulated, it excludes, necessarily, the action of all others that...would perform the same operation on the same thing." Marshall was sorely tempted, noting that "there is great force in this argument, and the court is not... | |
 | Gerhard Leibholz - 1981 - 718 pages
...that, as the word >to regulate< implies in its nature, full power over the thing to be regulated, it excludes, necessarily, the action of all others that...would perform the same operation on the same thing. That regulation 23 Gibbons v. Ogden, 17Johns. (NY) 488 (1820). 24 6 Wheat. (US) 264, 413-4(1821). .... | |
 | Ohio State Bar Association - 1907 - 252 pages
...that as the word to 'regulate' implies in its nature, full power over the thing to be regulated, it excludes, necessarily, the action of all others that...would perform the same operation on the same thing. That regulation is designed for the entire result, applying to those parts which remain as they were... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1910 - 1352 pages
...Regulation of commerce.— Power to regulate Implies full power over the thing to be regulated, and excludes the action of all others that would perform the same operation on same thing, p. 209. Cited to this point In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Pet. 44, 8 L. 40, and principle... | |
 | 1904 - 1116 pages
...that, aa the word to "regulate " implies in its nature full jxjwer over the thing to be regulated, it excludes, necessarily, the action of all others that would perform the same oj>eration on the same thing. That regulation is designed for the entire result, applying to those... | |
| |
That regulation is designed for the entire result, applying to those parts which remain as they were, as well as to those which are altered. It produces a uniform whole, which is as much disturbed and deranged by changing what the regulating power designs... 
